Symmetrical voice and linking in western Austronesian languages /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Riesberg, Sonja, author.
Imprint:Berlin : De Gruyter Mouton, [2014].
©2014
Description:xi, 244 pages : illustrations ; 24 cm.
Language:English
Series:Pacific Linguistics ; volume 646
Pacific linguistics ; 646.
Subject:
Format: Print Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/10079993
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:1614518785
9781614518785
Notes:Includes bibliographical references (pages [232]-241) and index.
Summary:This book is an in-depth study of the voice systems of Totoli, Balinese, Indonesian, and Tagalog, which shows that the symmetrical nature of these systems poses a problem to current linking theories. It provides an analysis of symmetrical linking within two grammatical theories (LFG & RRG) and develops a modified LFG linking mechanism that sheds light on the differences as well as the similarities of symmetrical and asymmetrical voice systems.--Back cover.
Table of Contents:
  • Acknowledgements
  • Abbreviations
  • 1. Introduction
  • 1.1. What is symmetrical voice?
  • 1.2. Symmetrical voice and syntactic theory
  • 1.3. The data
  • 1.4. Content and structure
  • 2. The Symmetry of the Voices in Indonesian, Balinese, Totoli, and Tagalog
  • 2.1. Introduction
  • 2.2. Basic morpho-syntactic properties
  • 2.2.1. Indonesian
  • 2.2.2. Batinese
  • 2.2.3. Totoli
  • 2.2.4. Tagalog
  • 2.2.5. Morphological marking and the markedness of voices
  • 2.3. Subject properties
  • 2.3.1. Relativisation
  • 2.3.2. Control
  • 2.3.3. Raising
  • 2.3.4. Quantifier floating and secondary predicates
  • 2.4. Properties of the non-subject argument
  • 2.4.1. Quantifier floating and secondary predicates
  • 2.4.2. Word order
  • 2.4.3. Adjunct fronting
  • 2.5. Challenging data
  • 2.5.1. Reflexive binding
  • 2.5.2. Control in Tagalog
  • 2.6. Symmetrical voice languages
  • 2.6.1. Against an undergoer-voice-as-passive analysis
  • 2.6.2. Against an actor-voice-as-antipassive analysis
  • 2.7. Conclusion
  • 3. Linking Semantic Arguments to Syntax
  • 3.1. Introduction
  • 3.2. LFG and the Lexical Mapping Theory (LMT)
  • 3.2.1. Asymmetrical linking and standard assumptions of LMT
  • 3.2.2. Symmetrical voice as a challenge for standard LMT
  • 3.2.3. Non-canonical linking in the LFG literature
  • 3.2.3.1. Presentational focus
  • 3.2.3.2. Underspecification of the actor argument
  • 3.2.3.3. Morpholexically predetermined SUBJ linking
  • 3.2.3.4. Inverse linking
  • 3.3. Role and Reference Grammar
  • 3.3.1. Standard assumptions and asymmetric linking in RRG
  • 3.3.2. Symmetrical voice as a challenge to linking in RRG
  • 3.4. Conclusion
  • 4. Coreness, Obliqueness, and the Status of the Passive Actor
  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. CORE VS. OBLIQUE revisited
  • 4.3. The status of the passive actor
  • 4.3.1. Distinguishing arguments from adjuncts
  • 4.3.2. A multi-step approach to the argument-adjunct-distinction
  • 4.4. The core-oblique distinction in Austronesian languages
  • 4.5. "Symmetries" in asymmetrical languages
  • 4.6. Conclusion
  • 5. A Modified LFG Approach to Linking
  • 5.1. Introduction
  • 5.2. Linking and the lexicon
  • 5.3. Morpholexical linking and inverse linking revisited
  • 5.3.1. The (pure) morpholexical approach
  • 5.3.2. Inverse linking (again)
  • 5.4. Approach A: Underspecification and morpholexical subject selection
  • 5.4.1. General assumptions
  • 5.4.2. Asymmetrical voice
  • 5.4.3. Symmetrical voice
  • 5.4.4. Passive
  • 5.4.5. Critique
  • 5.5. Approach B: Language specific classification of the agent
  • 5.5.1. General assumptions
  • 5.5.2. Linking asymmetrical and symmetrical voices
  • 5.5.3. Critique
  • 5.6. Limits of LMT
  • 5.6.1. The function of voice alternations
  • 5.6.2. Gradience in grammar
  • 5.6.3. Definiteness restrictions
  • 5.7. Conclusion
  • 6. Conclusion
  • Appendix
  • References
  • Index of subjects