Authoritarian origins of democratic party systems in Africa /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Riedl, Rachel Beatty.
Imprint:Cambridge ; New York : Cambridge University Press, 2014.
Description:xiv, 265 pages : illustrations, maps ; 24 cm
Language:English
Subject:
Format: Print Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/10086622
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:9781107045040 (hardback)
1107045045 (hardback)
9781107623019 (paperback)
1107623014 (paperback)
Notes:Includes bibliographical references (pages 233-252) and index.
Summary:"Faced with a transition to multiparty democracy, many assume that breaking the power of incumbents is necessary to develop a stable, highly institutionalized party system. But, in fact, across Sub-Saharan Africa, the incumbent's demise is sufficient to ensure a highly volatile, weakly institutionalized party system in the democratic era. A strong authoritarian incumbent produces a more coherent, stable party competition, with the unintended consequences of promoting national territorial coverage; stronger partisan identities; opposition cohesion; and, ultimately, democratic accountability. In Ghana, for example, the incumbent military leader and authoritarian revolutionary J. J. Rawlings and his National Democratic Congress (NDC) party swept the founding elections in 1992. Since that time, Ghana has developed a highly institutionalized party system with low levels of volatility and an alternating majority between stable parties. Ghana has experienced two democratic turnovers, and the two major parties, the NDC and the New Patriotic Party (NPP), are deeply connected to their constituencies, they organize across the national territory to compete in every constituency, they mobilize participation during and beyond elections, and they aggregate coalitions of diverse citizens and interests. The NDC and the NPP alike are enduring entities that help shape individual partisan identities and structure national, regional, and local competition"--
Review by Choice Review

In this first-rate former dissertation, Riedl (Northwestern Univ.) asserts that the nature of authoritarian regimes significantly influences the strength of ensuing democratic governments. She focuses on four states: Benin, Ghana, Senegal, and Zambia, chosen from the 23 democratic countries in Africa. Riedl's impressive fieldwork included more than 260 interviews, analysis of election results, surveys of political elites, and more. She notes that other analysts stress factors to explain democratization issues in contemporary Africa, such as economic development, colonial legacies, the political saliency of ethnicity, or electoral systems. Riedl concentrates instead on incorporation and neutralization of local elites into state structures by outgoing authoritarian governments. Well-established democratic systems, exemplified by Ghana and Senegal, develop more effective, stable regimes with fewer political parties. Less well-established systems, such as Benin or Zambia, were characterized before transition by governmental efforts to neutralize local authorities via state-sponsored organizations, rather than incorporate them into authoritarian systems. Elections there were marked by unstable party systems and limited voter participation. Riedl traces the global implications of her findings, which confirm Samuel Huntington's 1968 emphasis on the importance of institution building. An excellent bibliography and useful tables and figures add to Riedl's book's utility. --Claude E. Welch, University at Buffalo, SUNY

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Choice Review