Sued if you do, sued if you don't : Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act as a defense to race-conscious districting /
Saved in:
Author / Creator: | Wong, Caroline A., author. |
---|---|
Imprint: | [Chicago, Illinois] : Law School, University of Chicago, 2015. |
Description: | 1 online resource (55 pages) ; maps |
Language: | English |
Series: | Public law and legal theory working paper ; no. 535 Public law and legal theory working paper ; no. 535. |
Subject: | |
Format: | E-Resource Book |
URL for this record: | http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/10362636 |
Notes: | "April 2015." Includes bibliographical references. Title from online title page (viewed September 23, 2015). |
---|---|
Summary: | "To avoid liability for vote dilution in violation of [Section] 2 of the Voting Rights Act, states officials sometimes engage in race-conscious remedial legislative districting. However, race-conscious remedial districting, while averting litigation over a [Section] 2 violation, simultaneously opens the door to a lawsuit in which an electoral district plan may be challenged as an unconstitutional racial classification under the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. A state that finds itself in potential violation of [Section] 2 is thus placed in a seemingly "impossible position." Whether it decides to forgo or pursue race-conscious remedial districting, the state leaves itself exposed to liability for violating either [Section] 2 of the Voting Rights Act or the Equal Protection Clause, respectively. In an effort to resolve this predicament, a few states have responded to equal protection racial-gerrymandering challenges by arguing that compliance with [Section] 2 constitutes an affirmative defense against claims of race-conscious districting. Whether such a [Section] 2 defense is legally cognizable, however, is a question that remains unresolved. Both times that the issue of the defense's viability has been raised before the US Supreme Court, the justices have expressly declined to address it. As a result, state governments - as well as courts and districting-litigation plaintiffs - have been left without answers to critical questions about the extent to which [Section] 2 requires, justifies, or forbids the incorporation of race-conscious principles in the design of electoral districts. This Comment endeavors to address those questions. Part I canvasses the legislative history of [Section] 2 and overviews the doctrinal frameworks governing federal claims of vote dilution and racial gerrymandering. Part II examines the various attempts that states have made to raise the [Section] 2 defense in response to racial-gerrymandering and state-constitutional claims. Finally, Part III argues that [Section] 2 indeed offers a legally cognizable defense against claims of racial districting for doctrinal and normative reasons. It then envisages how courts could apply the [Section] 2 defense in a way that would benefit states raising the defense in good faith but filter out states merely seeking to evade liability for unjustifiable race-based action. In light of the defense's application in both the vote-dilution and racial-gerrymandering contexts, Part III also explains that states might avoid violations of both [Section] 2 and the Equal Protection Clause by creating racially integrated coalitional districts." |
Similar Items
-
Partisan gerrymandering and the efficiency gap /
by: Stephanopoulos, Nicholas
Published: (2014) -
Voting rights : hearings before the Subcommittee on Civil and Constitutional Rights of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Third Congress, first and second sessions, October 14, 1993, May 11, and 25, 1994.
Published: (1994) -
One man-one vote, one vote-one value; the theory of equal representation.
by: Henriot, Peter J. (Peter Joseph), 1936-
Published: (1967) -
Proportional Representation : Apportionment Methods and Their Applications /
by: Pukelsheim, Friedrich
Published: (2017) -
Ratf**ked : the true story behind the secret plan to steal America's democracy /
by: Daley, David (Editor-in-chief)
Published: (2016)