Review by Choice Review
Although writing as a feminist and not as a professional historian, Butalia uses present-day interviews to fill in many of the gaps in conventional histories of India and Pakistan after partition. Her dual aims are to examine the "underside" of history and to ask "how do human beings relate to their history?" Butalia uses personal remembrances, especially those of women, children, and members of scheduled castes, to show how the amnesia and silences about the events surrounding Indian independence may be as informative as existing historical accounts. The diverse voices of "dispensable" women are the centerpiece of Butalia's interpretation of partition. She captures the emotional richness of individual tragedies and occasional heroism, and she retains and even celebrates the ambiguities and paradoxes in the memories brought to the surface. While acknowledging the very subjective basis of the personal stories and her selection of them, Butalia also points to their many points of convergence with official documents and more familiar historical records. The book occasionally suffers from unnecessary repetition and would have benefited from another round of editing, but its contents are a very worthy addition to our knowledge of partition and its consequences. Recommended for all readers. B. Tavakolian; Denison University
Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Publisher's Weekly Review
In 1947, British-ruled India was split into predominantly Hindu India and predominantly Muslim Pakistan, in what Butalia calls "one of the great human convulsions of history." Within a few months of this division, one million people had died, 12 million had migrated and 75,000 women were abducted and raped by men of religions different from their own. Although these facts are recorded in history, Butalia points out that the particular experiences of individuals are harder to discover. To fill the gap, Butalia, the cofounder of India's first feminist press, has spent 10 years gathering oral histories from those whose voices were often obscured by politics: women, lower castes and children who were separated from their families. She particularly focuses on the "double dislocation" endured by women, whose fates were often decided by the men of their religious communities. For example, many women were "rescued" from interfaith marriages and forced to return to their families; many had to leave children behind or were forced to have abortions. Others committed suicide to avoid forced conversions or rape; one woman describes her attempt to participate in a mass suicide of 90 women who drowned themselves in a well. By including official documents along with personal stories, Butalia shows that in political circles the need to protect women's religious "purity" gave legitimacy to PartitionÄthough women suffered much violence at the hands of their own communities. Butalia's book is remarkable for the author's critical analysis of her own experiences as well as of the existing literature, and for her skillful demonstration of how the memory of Partition continues to affect India today. (June) (c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved
(c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved
Review by Choice Review
Review by Publisher's Weekly Review
