Jurisprudence of Justice John Paul Stevens. Selected Opinions on the Jury's Role in Criminal Sentencing.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Corporate author / creator:Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service.
Imprint:[S.l] : [s.n.], 2010.
Description:9 p. : digital, PDF file.
Language:English
Subject:
Format: E-Resource U.S. Federal Government Document Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/10535671
Hidden Bibliographic Details
Other uniform titles:ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection.
Notes:Record is based on bibliographic data in ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection (last viewed Sept. 2012). Reuse except for individual research requires license from ProQuest, LLC.
CRS Report.
Summary:Analyzes legal opinions issued by retiring Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens regarding role of jury in criminal sentencing. Highlights significance of Supreme Court decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey, which ruled that a judge typically may not increase a sentence beyond the range prescribed by statute unless the increase is based on facts determined by a jury "beyond a reasonable doubt."
Other form:Microfiche version: Library of Congress.Congressional Research Service. Jurisprudence of Justice John Paul Stevens

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000001a 4500
001 10535671
006 m d f
007 cr bn mmmapmmp
008 110721s2010 dcu s f000 0 eng d
003 ICU
040 |a UMI  |c UMI 
084 |a CRS-2010-AML-0252 
110 2 |a Library of Congress.  |b Congressional Research Service. 
245 1 0 |a Jurisprudence of Justice John Paul Stevens.  |h [electronic resource] :  |b Selected Opinions on the Jury's Role in Criminal Sentencing. 
260 |a [S.l] :  |b [s.n.],  |c 2010. 
300 |a 9 p. :  |b digital, PDF file. 
500 |a Record is based on bibliographic data in ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection (last viewed Sept. 2012). Reuse except for individual research requires license from ProQuest, LLC. 
500 |a CRS Report. 
520 |a Analyzes legal opinions issued by retiring Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens regarding role of jury in criminal sentencing. Highlights significance of Supreme Court decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey, which ruled that a judge typically may not increase a sentence beyond the range prescribed by statute unless the increase is based on facts determined by a jury "beyond a reasonable doubt." 
650 0 |a Judges. 
650 0 |a Jury. 
650 0 |a Sentences (Criminal procedure) 
730 0 |a ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection. 
776 0 8 |i Microfiche version:   |a Library of Congress.Congressional Research Service.  |t Jurisprudence of Justice John Paul Stevens 
856 4 0 |u http://congressional.proquest.com/congcomp/getdoc?CRDC-ID=CRS-2010-AML-0252  |y ProQuest Congressional 
035 |a cis2007904206 
929 |a nox 
999 f f |i 113fa2e6-a82d-5fbb-a966-0bcf44afb116  |s 281b562d-c7b3-5a98-b339-3db842dac26b 
928 |t Library of Congress classification  |l Online  |c UC-FullText  |u http://congressional.proquest.com/congcomp/getdoc?CRDC-ID=CRS-2010-AML-0252  |z ProQuest Congressional  |g ebooks  |i 8717100