Civil Pleading Requirements After Bell Atlantic Corporation v. Twombly and Ashcroft v. Iqbal.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Corporate author / creator:Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service.
Imprint:[S.l] : [s.n.], 2010.
Description:14 p. : digital, PDF file.
Language:English
Subject:
Format: E-Resource U.S. Federal Government Document Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/10537243
Hidden Bibliographic Details
Other uniform titles:ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection.
Notes:Record is based on bibliographic data in ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection (last viewed Sept. 2012). Reuse except for individual research requires license from ProQuest, LLC.
CRS Report.
Summary:Discusses context and implications of Bell Atlantic Corporation v. Twombly and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, in which Supreme Court heightened the standard for evaluating civil pleading requirements. Reviews H.R. 4115, the Open Access to Courts Act of 2009, and S. 1504, the Notice Pleading Restoration Act of 2009, both to reverse the effects of Twombly and Iqbal decisions.
Other form:Microfiche version: Library of Congress.Congressional Research Service. Civil Pleading Requirements After Bell Atlantic Corporation v. Twombly and Ashcroft v. Iqbal

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000001a 4500
001 10537243
006 m d f
007 cr bn mmmapmmp
008 110721s2010 dcu s f000 0 eng d
003 ICU
040 |a UMI  |c UMI 
084 |a CRS-2010-FDT-0604 
110 2 |a Library of Congress.  |b Congressional Research Service. 
245 1 0 |a Civil Pleading Requirements After Bell Atlantic Corporation v. Twombly and Ashcroft v. Iqbal.  |h [electronic resource]. 
260 |a [S.l] :  |b [s.n.],  |c 2010. 
300 |a 14 p. :  |b digital, PDF file. 
500 |a Record is based on bibliographic data in ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection (last viewed Sept. 2012). Reuse except for individual research requires license from ProQuest, LLC. 
500 |a CRS Report. 
520 |a Discusses context and implications of Bell Atlantic Corporation v. Twombly and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, in which Supreme Court heightened the standard for evaluating civil pleading requirements. Reviews H.R. 4115, the Open Access to Courts Act of 2009, and S. 1504, the Notice Pleading Restoration Act of 2009, both to reverse the effects of Twombly and Iqbal decisions. 
650 0 |a Judge-made law. 
650 0 |a Civil procedure. 
730 0 |a ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection. 
776 0 8 |i Microfiche version:   |a Library of Congress.Congressional Research Service.  |t Civil Pleading Requirements After Bell Atlantic Corporation v. Twombly and Ashcroft v. Iqbal 
856 4 0 |u http://congressional.proquest.com/congcomp/getdoc?CRDC-ID=CRS-2010-FDT-0604  |y ProQuest Congressional 
035 |a cis2007905776 
929 |a nox 
999 f f |i e2996e79-274d-5af2-898f-2d6dc572b756  |s 160e4645-d917-5ba4-9178-89c00e56e772 
928 |t Library of Congress classification  |l Online  |c UC-FullText  |u http://congressional.proquest.com/congcomp/getdoc?CRDC-ID=CRS-2010-FDT-0604  |z ProQuest Congressional  |g ebooks  |i 8718671