Constitutionality of Campaign Finance Regulation Buckley v. Valeo and Its Supreme Court Progeny.

Constitutionality of Campaign Finance Regulation Buckley v. Valeo and Its Supreme Court Progeny.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Corporate author / creator:Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service.
Imprint:[S.l] : [s.n.], 2008.
Description:49 p. : digital, PDF file.
Language:English
Subject:
Judge-made law.
Constitutional law.
Political parties.
Format: E-Resource U.S. Federal Government Document Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/10697941
Hidden Bibliographic Details
Other uniform titles:ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection.
Notes:Record is based on bibliographic data in ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection (last viewed Dec. 2010). Reuse except for individual research requires license from ProQuest, LLC.
CRS Report.
Summary:Discusses Supreme Court views on campaign finance regulation and constitutionality of the Federal Election Campaign Act in the First Amendment case of Buckley v. Valeo, and subsequent cases. Looks at contribution and expenditure limits, disclosure requirements, ballot initiatives, corporate expenditures, labor union solicitation of political action committee funds, political party and committee expenditures, leaflet distribution in issue-based elections, and political party soft money and electioneering communication restrictions.
Other form:Microfiche version: Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service. Constitutionality of Campaign Finance Regulation
Description
Item Description:Record is based on bibliographic data in ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection (last viewed Dec. 2010). Reuse except for individual research requires license from ProQuest, LLC.
CRS Report.
Physical Description:49 p. : digital, PDF file.

Similar Items