Constitutionality of Campaign Finance Regulation Buckley v. Valeo and Its Supreme Court Progeny.

Constitutionality of Campaign Finance Regulation Buckley v. Valeo and Its Supreme Court Progeny.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Corporate author / creator:Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service.
Imprint:[S.l] : [s.n.], 2008.
Description:49 p. : digital, PDF file.
Language:English
Subject:
Judge-made law.
Constitutional law.
Political parties.
Format: E-Resource U.S. Federal Government Document Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/10697941
Hidden Bibliographic Details
Other uniform titles:ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection.
Notes:Record is based on bibliographic data in ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection (last viewed Dec. 2010). Reuse except for individual research requires license from ProQuest, LLC.
CRS Report.
Summary:Discusses Supreme Court views on campaign finance regulation and constitutionality of the Federal Election Campaign Act in the First Amendment case of Buckley v. Valeo, and subsequent cases. Looks at contribution and expenditure limits, disclosure requirements, ballot initiatives, corporate expenditures, labor union solicitation of political action committee funds, political party and committee expenditures, leaflet distribution in issue-based elections, and political party soft money and electioneering communication restrictions.
Other form:Microfiche version: Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service. Constitutionality of Campaign Finance Regulation

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000001a 4500
001 10697941
006 m d f
007 cr bn mmmapmmp
008 101220s2008 dcu s f000 0 eng d
003 ICU
040 |a ProQuest  |c ProQuest 
084 |a CRS-2008-AML-0194 
110 2 |a Library of Congress.  |b Congressional Research Service. 
245 1 0 |a Constitutionality of Campaign Finance Regulation  |h [electronic resource] :  |b Buckley v. Valeo and Its Supreme Court Progeny. 
260 |a [S.l] :  |b [s.n.],  |c 2008. 
300 |a 49 p. :  |b digital, PDF file. 
500 |a Record is based on bibliographic data in ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection (last viewed Dec. 2010). Reuse except for individual research requires license from ProQuest, LLC. 
500 |a CRS Report. 
520 |a Discusses Supreme Court views on campaign finance regulation and constitutionality of the Federal Election Campaign Act in the First Amendment case of Buckley v. Valeo, and subsequent cases. Looks at contribution and expenditure limits, disclosure requirements, ballot initiatives, corporate expenditures, labor union solicitation of political action committee funds, political party and committee expenditures, leaflet distribution in issue-based elections, and political party soft money and electioneering communication restrictions. 
650 0 |a Judge-made law. 
650 0 |a Constitutional law. 
650 0 |a Political parties. 
730 0 |a ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection. 
776 0 8 |i Microfiche version:   |a Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service.  |t Constitutionality of Campaign Finance Regulation 
856 4 0 |u http://congressional.proquest.com/congcomp/getdoc?CRDC-ID=CRS-2008-AML-0194  |y ProQuest Congressional 
035 |a cis2007863344 
929 |a nox 
999 f f |i 692b9fd9-9312-52f3-8450-d93f0c984bf2  |s bc596ed6-6274-5704-b0dd-fd2ad256e0f8 
928 |t Library of Congress classification  |l Online  |c UC-FullText  |u http://congressional.proquest.com/congcomp/getdoc?CRDC-ID=CRS-2008-AML-0194  |z ProQuest Congressional  |g ebooks  |i 8880017 

Similar Items