Dyslexia : developing the debate /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Elliott, Julian, 1955- author.
Imprint:London ; New York : Bloomsbury Academic, 2016.
Description:x, 207 pages : illustrations ; 22 cm
Language:English
Series:Key debates in educational policy
Key debates in educational policy.
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Print Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/10811035
Hidden Bibliographic Details
Other authors / contributors:Nicolson, Rod, author.
ISBN:9781474233750
1474233759
9781474233736
1474233732
9781474233743
Notes:Includes bibliographical references and index.
Summary:"Dyslexia is often presented as a clearly delineated condition that can be diagnosed on the basis of appropriate cognitive tests with corresponding forms on intervention. However, this approachable text explores the issues behind this assertion in bringing together leading figures in the field to debate dyslexia. Julian Elliott shows that understandings and usage of the dyslexia label vary substantially with little consensus or agreement and in putting forward his critique draws upon research in several disciplinary fields to demonstrate the irrationality of these arguments. Roderick I. Nicolson demonstrates that current approaches to understanding, identification and support of dyslexia are catastrophically flawed in terms of their failure to consider the developmental nature of dyslexia. He develops two themes: first that the underlying cause of dyslexia is 'delayed neural commitment' for skills and neural circuits, and second that the cause of the reading disability is the introduction of formal instruction before the dyslexic child's neural circuits for executive function are sufficiently developed. He argues that a more effective and cost-effective approach to identification and support involves 'assessment for dyslexia' rather than 'of dyslexia'. Elliott and Nicolson respond to the points each other raise before Andrew Davis investigates how far the key claims of Elliott and Nicolson can withstand close conceptual investigation, and explores the inherent limitations of scientific research on this topic, given the value and conceptual issues concerned"--
Review by Choice Review

The release of this work could not be timed any better. Since 2012, the number of states passing dyslexia laws has increased significantly. In February 2016, President Obama signed into law a federal dyslexia bill sponsored by Rep. Julia Brownley that provides 5 million dollars to study dyslexia through 2021. The majority of state laws and Brownley's federal bill reflect many views of the International Dyslexia Association (IDA). Following Elliott and Grigorenko's The Dyslexia Debate (2014), Elliott (education, Durham Univ., UK) and Nicolson (psychology, Univ. of Sheffield, UK) take the discussion to a heightened level of clarification and presentation of the most recent advances in dyslexia research and thought. Providing readers with two sides of the discussion, Nicolson speaks to the flaws associated with the current understanding and identification of dyslexia, and Elliott continues to highlight the lack of consensus and agreement among researchers about the operational definitions and distinct etiologies associated with dyslexia research. Their back-and-forth chapters are excellent reading for all who think they understand what some have labeled the new "meme" for the field of literacy. Summing Up: Recommended. Upper-division undergraduates and above; researchers and professionals. --Kent Layton, University of Arkansas at Little Rock

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Choice Review