The semantics of evidentials /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Murray, Sarah E., author.
Edition:First edition.
Imprint:Oxford, United Kingdom : Oxford University Press, 2017.
Description:xvi, 172 pages : illustrations ; 26 cm.
Language:English
Series:Oxford studies in semantics and pragmatics ; [9]
Oxford studies in semantics and pragmatics ; 9.
Subject:
Format: Print Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/11018619
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:0199681570
9780199681570
0199681589
9780199681587
Notes:Series number taken from book jacket.
Includes bibliographical references (pages 161-168) and index.
Summary:This book provides a compositional, truth-conditional, crosslinguistic semantics for evidentiality, the linguistic encoding of the source of information on which a statement is based. Central to the proposed theory is the distinction between what propositional content is at-issue and what content is not-at-issue. Evidentials contribute not-at-issue content, and can affect the level of commitment a sentence makes to the main proposition, contributed by sentential mood. In this volume, Sarah Murray builds on recent work in the formal semantics of evidentials and related phenomena, and proposes a semantics that does not appeal to separate dimensions of illocutionary meaning. Instead, she argues that all sentences make three contributions: at-issue content, not-at-issue content, and an illocutionary relation. At-issue content is presented and made available for subsequent anaphora, but is not directly added to the common ground; not-at-issue content directly updates the common ground; and the illocutionary relation uses the at-issue content to impose structure on the common ground, which, depending on the clause type, can trigger further updates. 0The analysis is supported by extensive empirical data from Cheyenne, drawn from the author's own fieldwork, as well as from English and a variety of other languages.

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000Ii 4500
001 11018619
003 ICU
005 20170602085657.7
008 160517s2017 enka b 001 0 eng d
019 |a 957241108 
020 |a 0199681570 
020 |a 9780199681570 
020 |a 0199681589 
020 |a 9780199681587 
035 |a (OCoLC)949911925  |z (OCoLC)957241108 
040 |a YDXCP  |b eng  |e rda  |c YDXCP  |d OCLCQ  |d NYP  |d YDX  |d OCLCO  |d BDX  |d OCLCF 
049 |a CGUA 
050 4 |a P325.5.E96  |b M87 2017 
082 0 4 |a 415  |2 23 
100 1 |a Murray, Sarah E.,  |e author.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2017061897  |1 http://viaf.org/viaf/2540149619444704010009 
245 1 4 |a The semantics of evidentials /  |c Sarah E. Murray. 
250 |a First edition. 
264 1 |a Oxford, United Kingdom :  |b Oxford University Press,  |c 2017. 
300 |a xvi, 172 pages :  |b illustrations ;  |c 26 cm. 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent  |0 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/contentTypes/txt 
337 |a unmediated  |b n  |2 rdamedia  |0 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/mediaTypes/n 
338 |a volume  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier  |0 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/carriers/nc 
490 1 |a Oxford studies in semantics and pragmatics ;  |v [9] 
500 |a Series number taken from book jacket. 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 161-168) and index. 
520 8 |a This book provides a compositional, truth-conditional, crosslinguistic semantics for evidentiality, the linguistic encoding of the source of information on which a statement is based. Central to the proposed theory is the distinction between what propositional content is at-issue and what content is not-at-issue. Evidentials contribute not-at-issue content, and can affect the level of commitment a sentence makes to the main proposition, contributed by sentential mood. In this volume, Sarah Murray builds on recent work in the formal semantics of evidentials and related phenomena, and proposes a semantics that does not appeal to separate dimensions of illocutionary meaning. Instead, she argues that all sentences make three contributions: at-issue content, not-at-issue content, and an illocutionary relation. At-issue content is presented and made available for subsequent anaphora, but is not directly added to the common ground; not-at-issue content directly updates the common ground; and the illocutionary relation uses the at-issue content to impose structure on the common ground, which, depending on the clause type, can trigger further updates. 0The analysis is supported by extensive empirical data from Cheyenne, drawn from the author's own fieldwork, as well as from English and a variety of other languages. 
650 0 |a Evidentials (Linguistics)  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2001004875 
650 0 |a Semantics.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2001008780 
650 7 |a Evidentials (Linguistics)  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00917248 
830 0 |a Oxford studies in semantics and pragmatics ;  |v 9. 
903 |a HeVa 
929 |a cat 
999 f f |i 1c7ef15c-98d1-57ae-97e3-825e03b5f7a4  |s e89f6715-2d8b-5705-8f1e-2caebab25983 
928 |t Library of Congress classification  |a P325.5.E96 M87 2017  |l JRL  |c JRL-Gen  |i 9511171 
927 |t Library of Congress classification  |a P325.5.E96 M87 2017  |l JRL  |c JRL-Gen  |e RECA  |b 113663884  |i 9756500