Improving GIS-based wildlife-habitat analysis /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Keller, Jeffrey K., author.
Imprint:Cham : Springer, [2014]
©2014
Description:1 online resource : illustrations.
Language:English
Series:SpringerBriefs in ecology
SpringerBriefs in ecology.
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/11088233
Hidden Bibliographic Details
Other authors / contributors:Smith, Charles R., author.
ISBN:9783319096087
3319096087
3319096079
9783319096070
9783319096070
Notes:Includes bibliographical references and index.
Online resource; title from PDF title page (EBSCO, viewed October 10, 2014).
Summary:Geographic Information Systems (GIS) provide a powerful tool for the investigation of species-habitat relationships and the development of wildlife management and conservation programs. However, the relative ease of data manipulation and analysis using GIS, associated landscape metrics packages, and sophisticated statistical tests may sometimes cause investigators to overlook important species-habitat functional relationships. Additionally, underlying assumptions of the study design or technology may have unrecognized consequences. This volume examines how initial researcher choices of image resolution, scale(s) of analysis, response and explanatory variables, and location and area of samples can influence analysis results, interpretation, predictive capability, and study-derived management prescriptions. Overall, most studies in this realm employ relatively low resolution imagery that allows neither identification nor accurate classification of habitat components. Additionally, the landscape metrics typically employed do not adequately quantify component spatial arrangement associated with species occupation. To address this latter issue, the authors introduce two novel landscape metrics that measure the functional size and location in the landscape of taxon-specific?solid? and?edge? habitat types. Keller and Smith conclude that investigators conducting GIS-based analyses of species-habitat relationships should more carefully 1) match the resolution of remotely sensed imagery to the scale of habitat functional relationships of the focal taxon, 2) identify attributes (explanatory variables) of habitat architecture, size, configuration, quality, and context that reflect the way the focal taxon uses the subset of the landscape it occupies, and 3) match the location and scale of habitat samples, whether GIS- or ground-based, to corresponding species? detection locations and scales of habitat use.
Other form:Printed edition: 9783319096070
Standard no.:10.1007/978-3-319-09608-7

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000Ii 4500
001 11088233
005 20170630045319.2
006 m o d
007 cr cnu---unuuu
008 141010s2014 sz a ob 001 0 eng d
003 ICU
040 |a N$T  |b eng  |e rda  |e pn  |c N$T  |d GW5XE  |d E7B  |d YDXCP  |d OCLCQ  |d COO  |d OCLCF  |d EBLCP  |d OCLCQ  |d UAB  |d Z5A 
020 |a 9783319096087  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 3319096087  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 3319096079  |q (print) 
020 |a 9783319096070  |q (print) 
020 |z 9783319096070 
024 7 |a 10.1007/978-3-319-09608-7  |2 doi 
035 |a (OCoLC)892734236 
050 4 |a QH541.15.R4 
072 7 |a TEC  |x 003000  |2 bisacsh 
049 |a MAIN 
100 1 |a Keller, Jeffrey K.,  |e author.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2015055320  |1 http://viaf.org/viaf/315243873 
245 1 0 |a Improving GIS-based wildlife-habitat analysis /  |c Jeffrey K. Keller, Charles R. Smith. 
264 1 |a Cham :  |b Springer,  |c [2014] 
264 4 |c ©2014 
300 |a 1 online resource :  |b illustrations. 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent  |0 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/contentTypes/txt 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia  |0 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/mediaTypes/c 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier  |0 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/carriers/cr 
490 1 |a SpringerBriefs in ecology 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references and index. 
588 0 |a Online resource; title from PDF title page (EBSCO, viewed October 10, 2014). 
505 0 |a Chapter 1. Working Definitions -- Chapter 2. Image Resolution vs. Habitat Selection Scale in a Remote Sensing Context -- Chapter 3. Explanatory Variables -- Chapter 4. Landscape Sampling Area vs. Actual Location of Taxonomic Survey -- Chapter 5. Refining Habitat Specificity -- Chapter 6. Example Using High-resolution Imagery and Taxon-specific Variables. 
520 |a Geographic Information Systems (GIS) provide a powerful tool for the investigation of species-habitat relationships and the development of wildlife management and conservation programs. However, the relative ease of data manipulation and analysis using GIS, associated landscape metrics packages, and sophisticated statistical tests may sometimes cause investigators to overlook important species-habitat functional relationships. Additionally, underlying assumptions of the study design or technology may have unrecognized consequences. This volume examines how initial researcher choices of image resolution, scale(s) of analysis, response and explanatory variables, and location and area of samples can influence analysis results, interpretation, predictive capability, and study-derived management prescriptions. Overall, most studies in this realm employ relatively low resolution imagery that allows neither identification nor accurate classification of habitat components. Additionally, the landscape metrics typically employed do not adequately quantify component spatial arrangement associated with species occupation. To address this latter issue, the authors introduce two novel landscape metrics that measure the functional size and location in the landscape of taxon-specific?solid? and?edge? habitat types. Keller and Smith conclude that investigators conducting GIS-based analyses of species-habitat relationships should more carefully 1) match the resolution of remotely sensed imagery to the scale of habitat functional relationships of the focal taxon, 2) identify attributes (explanatory variables) of habitat architecture, size, configuration, quality, and context that reflect the way the focal taxon uses the subset of the landscape it occupies, and 3) match the location and scale of habitat samples, whether GIS- or ground-based, to corresponding species? detection locations and scales of habitat use. 
650 0 |a Habitat (Ecology)  |x Remote sensing. 
650 0 |a Wildlife management  |x Remote sensing. 
650 0 |a Geographic information systems.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2003007733 
650 7 |a TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING  |x Agriculture  |x General.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a Geographic information systems.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00940423 
650 7 |a Habitat (Ecology)  |x Remote sensing.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00950049 
650 7 |a Wildlife management  |x Remote sensing.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01175346 
655 4 |a Electronic books. 
700 1 |a Smith, Charles R.,  |e author.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2020019468  |1 http://viaf.org/viaf/63611689 
776 0 8 |i Printed edition:  |z 9783319096070 
830 0 |a SpringerBriefs in ecology.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2011179421 
856 4 0 |u http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-09608-7  |y SpringerLink 
903 |a HeVa 
929 |a eresource 
999 f f |i c779c348-2ae4-5564-a54f-e45e6e3ea0f7  |s d253447f-e222-548a-bcff-c3f4af8c99b2 
928 |t Library of Congress classification  |a QH541.15.R4  |l Online  |c UC-FullText  |u http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-09608-7  |z SpringerLink  |g ebooks  |i 9900485