Evolutionary archaeology : theory and application /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Imprint:Salt Lake City : University of Utah Press, ©1996.
Description:1 online resource (xv, 329 pages) : illustrations.
Language:English
Series:Foundations of archaeological inquiry
Foundations of archaeological inquiry.
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/11105796
Hidden Bibliographic Details
Other authors / contributors:O'Brien, Michael J. (Michael John), 1950-
ISBN:0585133417
9780585133416
0874805023
9780874805024
0874805147
9780874805147
Notes:Includes bibliographical references (pages 285-318) and index.
Restrictions unspecified
Electronic reproduction. [S.l.] : HathiTrust Digital Library, 2010.
Master and use copy. Digital master created according to Benchmark for Faithful Digital Reproductions of Monographs and Serials, Version 1. Digital Library Federation, December 2002. http://purl.oclc.org/DLF/benchrepro0212
English.
digitized 2010 HathiTrust Digital Library committed to preserve
Print version record.
Other form:Print version: Evolutionary archaeology. Salt Lake City : University of Utah Press, ©1996 0874805023
Review by Choice Review

This festschrift for Robert Dunnell includes seven of his papers, two by the late David Rindos, two coauthored by editor Michael O'Brien, and one each by Hector Neff, David Braun, and R.D. Leonard and G.T. Jones. All but the essays by Braun and Rindos appear in Evolutionary Archaeology, ed. by Patrice Teltser (1995). "Evolutionary archaeology" as defined by this group began with Dunnell's 1978 paper, inspired by reading Stephen Jay Gould's essays, arguing that others neglect the essential role of natural selection in cultural evolution. Dunnell proposed a "modern scientific evolutionary archaeology" based on the principle that artifacts are as much part of human phenotypes as are somatic features, and therefore (says editor O'Brien) "subject to [natural] selection" for fitness. Eschewing "progress" and stages, Dunnell premises unceasing selection of behavior and artifacts for greater fitness. Gould has in recent years emphasized contingency and apparent presence of nonadaptive, nondeleterious features, for which Dunnell declares Gould's "recent work ... simply bad biology." This reviewer finds Dunnell's "method" reductionist, dogmatic, and at odds with recent concern in archaeology for identifying human agency. The volume presents one narrow school, useful principally for graduate seminars. A. B. Kehoe; Marquette University

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Choice Review