Language, thought and consciousness : an essay in philosophical psychology /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Carruthers, Peter, 1952-
Imprint:Cambridge [England] ; New York, N.Y. : Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Description:1 online resource (xv, 291 pages)
Language:English
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/11114476
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:0511002076
9780511002076
9780521639996
0521639999
0521481589
9780521481588
9780511583360
0511583362
0521639999
Notes:Includes bibliographical references (pages 280-286) and index.
English.
Print version record.
Summary:Do we think in natural language? Or is language only for communication? Much recent work in philosophy and cognitive science assumes the latter. In contrast, Peter Carruthers argues that much of human conscious thinking is conducted in the medium of natural language sentences. However, this does not commit him to any sort of Whorfian linguistic relativism, and the view is developed within a framework that is broadly nativist and modularist. His study will be essential reading for all those interested in the nature and significance of natural language, whether they come from philosophy, psychology or linguistics.
Other form:Print version: Carruthers, Peter, 1952- Language, thought and consciousness. Cambridge [England] ; New York, N.Y. : Cambridge University Press, 1996 0521639999
Review by Choice Review

Carruthers (Univ. of Sheffield) attempts to establish an original theory concerning the relation of thought, language, and consciousness. As opposed to the communicative theory of language held by Fodor, Chomsky, and Pinker, which understands language to be an input/output module used to convey thought, Carruthers argues for a cognitivist approach. He claims that language is constitutive of some conscious thoughts--we cannot think some thoughts without a natural language. However, unlike mainstream cognitivists such as Wittgenstein, Whorf, and Dennett, Carruthers refuses to endorse a social/relativist position that understands mind and language as cultural constructs. Thus, he combines nativist views of language and mind with a cognitivist approach that holds that some conscious thinking necessarily involves language. The argument is presented with convincing force and clarity, making this a work that all philosophers, cognitive scientists, and linguists working in this field must read. Upper-division undergraduate; graduate; faculty. J. H. Riker Colorado College

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Choice Review