The compromise of liberal environmentalism /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Bernstein, Steven F.
Imprint:New York : Columbia University Press, ©2001.
Description:1 online resource (xii, 314 pages)
Language:English
Series:Columbia international affairs online. Books
Columbia international affairs online. Books.
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/11117799
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:0231504306
9780231504300
9780231120371
0231120370
0231120362
Digital file characteristics:text file
PDF
Notes:Includes bibliographical references (pages 271-293) and index.
In English.
Print version record.
Summary:The most significant shift in environmental governance over the last thirty years has been the convergence of environmental and liberal economic norms toward ""liberal environmentalism""?which predicates environmental protection on the promotion and maintenance of a liberal economic order. Steven Bernstein assesses the reasons for this historical shift, introduces a socio-evolutionary explanation for the selection of international norms, and considers the implications for our ability to address global environmental problems. The author maintains that the institutionalization of ""s
Other form:Print version: Bernstein, Steven F. Compromise of liberal environmentalism. New York : Columbia University Press, ©2001 0231120362
Standard no.:10.7312/bern12036
Review by Choice Review

Bernstein examines major international environmental conferences that address the relationship between environment and development, in the process explaining coherently the change in international norms of environmental governance from those focusing on environmental protection to those he dubs "liberal environmentalism." While the former implies protecting the environment from the forces of the marketplace, the latter is categorized by its focus on market mechanisms and human-centered economic development. The book makes an argument for how to understand this normative change, based on a "socio-evolution" in which ideas interact with institutionalized social structures and the norms they already contain. Bernstein convincingly and usefully rejects the role of epistemic communities as a driving force behind the norm change he identifies. But his universe of cases (major international pronouncements), rather than being an easy test for epistemic community theory as he suggests, is actually a poor realm in which to examine the role of scientific expertise; issue-specific international agreements, rather than large-scale norm generation, is where one would expect scientists to have the greatest role. Whether or not one agrees about how these norms get adopted, Bernstein's explanation that they do is compelling and his attention to the role of ideas in environmental policy important. Recommended for upper-division undergraduates and above. E. R. DeSombre Wellesley College

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Choice Review