Academic pathfinders : knowledge creation and feminist scholarship /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Gumport, Patricia J.
Imprint:Westport, Conn. : Greenwood Press, 2002.
Description:1 online resource (xviii, 199 pages)
Language:English
Series:Greenwood studies in higher education, 1531-8087
Greenwood studies in higher education,
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/11126069
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:0313011044
9780313011047
0313320969
9780313320965
9786610468706
6610468702
Digital file characteristics:data file
Notes:Includes bibliographical references (pages 179-191) and index.
Restrictions unspecified
Electronic reproduction. [Place of publication not identified] : HathiTrust Digital Library, 2010.
Master and use copy. Digital master created according to Benchmark for Faithful Digital Reproductions of Monographs and Serials, Version 1. Digital Library Federation, December 2002. http://purl.oclc.org/DLF/benchrepro0212
digitized 2010 HathiTrust Digital Library committed to preserve
Print version record.
Other form:Print version: Gumport, Patricia J. Academic pathfinders. Westport, Conn. : Greenwood Press, 2002 0313320969
Review by Choice Review

This study documents the development of feminist scholars and scholarship in history, sociology, philosophy, and women's studies from the 1960s to the present. Gumport interviewed 35 female scholars and then wove their responses into a well-researched history of feminist theory. She divides these women into "pathfinders," who developed feminist scholarship in their respective subject area in the late 1960s to the mid-1970s, "pathtakers," who came later and could choose whether they wished to pursue feminist theory in their discipline or simply ignore it, and "forerunners," who had finished their academic preparation before the mid-1960s and then later accepted or ignored feminism in their scholarly lives. Gumport points out that feminist theory was much easier to insert into history than into philosophy or sociology. The book also contains a history of the development of women's studies programs and a discussion of the problems of programmatic contraction as universities became pressured to become more efficient. An excellent short history of the creation of women's studies programs is included as well. A former dissertation, this book is a bit dry but should interest historians, sociologists, philosophers, and feminists. Suitable for college libraries at lower-and upper-division undergraduate levels. E. L. Ihle James Madison University

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Choice Review