Europe through Arab eyes, 1578-1727 /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Matar, N. I. (Nabil I.), 1949-
Imprint:New York : Columbia University Press, ©2009.
Description:1 online resource (xxviii, 313 pages)
Language:English
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/11150009
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:9780231512084
0231512082
9780231141949
0231141947
1280598298
9781280598296
9786613628121
6613628123
Notes:Includes bibliographical references (pages 277-300) and index.
English.
Summary:Traveling to archives in Tunisia, Morocco, France, and England, with visits to Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, and Spain, Nabil Matar assembles a rare history of Europe's rise to power as seen through the eyes of those who were later subjugated by it. Many historians of the Middle East believe Arabs and Muslims had no interest in Europe during this period of Western discovery and empire, but in fact these groups were very much engaged with the naval and industrial development, politics, and trade of European Christendom. Beginning in 1578 with a major Moroccan victory over a Portuguese i.
Other form:Print version: Matar, N.I. (Nabil I.), 1949- Europe through Arab eyes, 1578-1727. New York : Columbia University Press, ©2009
Review by Choice Review

Matar (English, Minnesota) takes existing narratives of the so-called East/West encounter in a fascinating, unexpected, rewarding direction. In many ways, he explodes these narratives. By focusing on the years 1587-1727 rather than on the medieval or modern periods, and on the western rather than the eastern Muslim world, Matar tells a story not of binaries, essentialized others, or stereotypes, but of complicated relationships among people who derived their knowledge as much from personal experience as from politics. The result is a book that by no means shrinks from describing fear, anger, or hatred, but that balances such descriptions with equally vivid accounts of curiosity and friendship. What is perhaps most valuable about Matar's analysis, however, is its accessibility. It would be an ideal text for upper-level undergraduate courses, not only because of the careful way in which the author destabilizes conventional wisdom, but also because the book is an excellent example of the creative use of source material. The collection of translated letters and first-person accounts that forms the second part of the book would also be invaluable to student researchers. Summing Up: Highly recommended. Upper-division undergraduates and above. R. A. Miller University of Massachusetts Boston

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Choice Review