New tech, new ties : how mobile communication is reshaping social cohesion /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Ling, Richard Seyler.
Imprint:Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press, ©2008.
Description:1 online resource (xiv, 224 pages)
Language:English
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/11159195
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:9780262278416
0262278413
9781435628021
1435628020
0262122979
9780262122979
1282099302
9781282099302
9786612099304
6612099305
Notes:Includes bibliographical references (pages 205-221) and index.
Print version record.
Summary:How cell phones and mobile communication may in many cases strengthen social cohesion.
Other form:Print version: Ling, Richard Seyler. New tech, new ties. Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press, ©2008 9780262122979 0262122979
Review by Choice Review

The central question of the book is whether and how "mobile communication allows for the execution of rituals that in turn result in social solidarity." Ling (Michigan) examines this question through observations of mobile phone communications and their impact on everyday interactions. Along with these observations, the author draws upon sociological theories of ritual, communication, and social solidarity to determine the extent to which these approaches can be applied in an era in which technologically mediated communication rivals face-to-face interaction. Through a discussion of such speech acts as gossip, joking, and repartee, Ling concludes, "there has been a recalibration of how social cohesion is being worked out in society." The increasing of local ties is not necessarily coming at the expense of broader social relationships. The ubiquity of mobile communications simply is changing the nature of what it means to be and stay connected. Thus, there needs to be a reexamination of how traditional understandings of social solidarity relate to a new era of communication. Summing Up: Recommended. All levels/libraries. G. C. David Bentley University

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Choice Review