Condemned to repeat? : the paradox of humanitarian action /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Terry, Fiona.
Imprint:Ithaca ; London : Cornell University Press, ©2002.
Description:1 online resource (xiv, 282 pages)
Language:English
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/11189981
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:9780801468643
0801468647
0801439604
080148796X
9780801487965
080148796X
9780801487965
0801468639
9780801468636
1336208171
9781336208179
Notes:Includes bibliographical references and index.
English.
Summary:Humanitarian groups have failed, Fiona Terry believes, to face up to the core paradox of their activity: humanitarian action aims to alleviate suffering, but by inadvertently sustaining conflict it potentially prolongs suffering. In Condemned to Repeat?, Terry examines the side-effects of intervention by aid organizations and points out the need to acknowledge the political consequences of the choice to give aid. The author makes the controversial claim that aid agencies act as though the initial decision to supply aid satisfies any need for ethical discussion and are often blind to the moral quandaries of aid. Terry focuses on four historically relevant cases: Rwandan camps in Zaire, Afghan camps in Pakistan, Salvadoran and Nicaraguan camps in Honduras, and Cambodian camps in Thailand. Terry was the head of the French section of Medecins sans frontieres (Doctors without Borders) when it withdrew from the Rwandan refugee camps in Zaire because aid intended for refugees actually strengthened those responsible for perpetrating genocide. This book contains documents from the former Rwandan army and government that were found in the refugee camps after they were attacked in late 1996. This material illustrates how combatants manipulate humanitarian action to their benefit. Condemned to Repeat? makes clear that the paradox of aid demands immediate attention by organizations and governments around the world. The author stresses that, if international agencies are to meet the needs of populations in crisis, their organizational behavior must adjust to the wider political and socioeconomic contexts in which aid occurs.
Other form:Print version: Terry, Fiona. Condemned to repeat?. Ithaca ; London : Cornell University Press, ©2002
Standard no.:9780801487965
Review by Choice Review

In this work Terry, associated with the private medical relief group Doctors without Borders, addresses the central question of whether relief agencies actually contribute to the wars and other conflicts whose victims they are trying to assist. She focuses on Afghan refugee camps in Pakistan, Nicaraguan and Salvadoran refugee camps in Honduras, Cambodian refugee camps in Thailand, and Rwandan refugee camps in Zaire. Noting that governments have various nonhumanitarian policies that are manifested in dealing with refugee flows, including allowing refugee camps to be used for military purposes, Terry concludes that aid agencies must necessarily contribute to these governmental maneuvers. But in general she does not find that the impact of the aid agencies on the outcome of militarized political struggles is very great. She concludes that the best aid agencies can do in the real world of governmental realpolitik is to try to minimize undesirable political impact that inheres in humanitarian assistance. This book is part of a broad review of international humanitarian assistance by various authors and institutions in the wake of the Balkan wars and other events of the late 20th century. Terry's views are not novel, but she does provide careful documentation of part of the larger picture. ^BSumming Up: Recommended. Graduate students and specialists. D. P. Forsythe University of Nebraska

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Library Journal Review

The director of research and former head of the French section of Mdicins sans Frontires (Doctors Without Borders), Terry has written a compelling book about the failure of international humanitarian organizations to take into consideration a wider political context before providing aid. This shortsightedness, argues Terry, results in the paradox that humanitarian aid aimed at alleviating suffering instead sustains the oppressive action that caused it. In clear and concise analysis, she begins with the controversial claim that the aid agencies respond in knee-jerk fashion to any conflict without further investigating or even considering the ramifications of their aid. In four documented cases Afghan camps in Pakistan, Salvadoran and Nicaraguan camps in Honduras, Cambodian camps in Thailand, and Rwandan camps in Zaire Terry details how aid given to help people often ends up in the coffers of the combatants. Terry backs up her claim with photocopies of documents that will be of special interest to scholars of the 1996 Rwanda massacres. Recommended for all libraries. Glenn Masuchika, Rockwell Collins Information Ctr., Cedar Rapids, IA (c) Copyright 2010. Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.

(c) Copyright Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.
Review by Choice Review


Review by Library Journal Review