Review by Choice Review
Ellickson (law, Yale) examines how disputes arising from property damage created by escaped cattle are understood and negotiated by farmers in Shasta County, California. Research reported in the book challenges a central proposition of law and economics scholarship the Coase Theorem holding that people bargain to mutual advantage from starting points established by legal entitlements. Field work (e.g., 73 interviews with landowners, lawyers, claims adjusters, and government employees) suggests that legal rules, doctrine, and formal procedures play little or no role as landowners confront and work through their problems. People develop mutual understandings of their situation by means of informal rules and adaptive norms of neighborliness that develop without reference to law. The insight that law frequently is peripheral has gained widespread acceptance in the sociological and anthropological literature (e.g., Carol J. Greenhouse, Praying for Justice, CH, May'87), but Ellickson attempts to bring the insights of law and society research to law and economics scholarship. Field work is used to develop a "general theory of social control, " which, drawing on game theory and based on assumptions from rational choice models, should contribute to law and economics work on disputes. Footnotes, but no bibliography. Recommended for graduate collections in economics.-M. Kessler, Bates College
Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Choice Review