In defense of disciplines : interdisciplinarity and specialization in the research university /

Jacobs (sociology, Univ. of Pennsylvania) has written an important work. In part 1 (chapters 1-6), he defends liberal arts and science disciplines against the criticism that they are "silos" cut off from outside influences. In part 2 (chapters 7-10), he points to the limitations of interdisciplinary alternatives as a way of structuring research universities. Such limitations also apply to calls for "integrated" education at the undergraduate level. By definition, interdisciplinary solutions--e.g., joint appointments, interdisciplinary structures--transcend department boundaries and are likely to increase the power of administrators and lessen faculty input. Jacobs puts his knowledge of the university and his keen sociological eye to good use and bases his discussion on existing studies and on primary and secondary data. His use of citation analyses to explore the issue of the flow of information among disciplines is particularly impressive, as is his chapter-long analysis of the interdisciplinary limitations of the field of American studies. The concluding chapter points to the role of narrow, applied, career-oriented programs at the expense of broad-based liberal arts and science programs. Summing Up: Highly recommended. Advanced students, faculty and scholars, and policy makers. M. Oromaner formerly, Hudson County Community College