Evolutionary restraints : the contentious history of group selection /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Borrello, Mark E.
Imprint:Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 2010.
Description:1 online resource (xi, 215 pages) : illustrations
Language:English
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/11232221
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:9780226067025
0226067025
9780226067018
0226067017
Notes:Includes bibliographical references and index.
Print version record.
Summary:Much of the history of the evolutionary debate since Darwin has focused on the level at which natural selection occurs. Most biologists acknowledge multiple levels of selection--from the gene, the trait, and the organism, to the family, the group, and the species. However, it is the debate about group selection that Mark E. Borrello focuses on in Evolutionary Restraints. Tracing the history of biological attempts to determine whether selection could lead to the evolution of fitter groups, Borrello takes as his focus the British naturalist V.C. Wynne-Edwards, who proposed that animals could reg.
Other form:Print version: Borrello, Mark E. Evolutionary restraints. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 2010 9780226067018
Review by Choice Review

Evolutionary Restraints discusses the history and debate about group selection, focusing on the contributions of British naturalist Vero Copner Wynne-Edwards. Wynne-Edwards argued that group selection permits animals to regulate their population levels and avoid overexploitation of food supplies and other resources. Group selection assumes that natural selection occurs at a level above the level of the individual and is key to social organization, altruistic behavior, and perhaps the evolution of intellect and morality. Borrello (history of science, Univ. of Minnesota) indicates that most biologists acknowledge multiple levels of natural selection: genes, traits, organisms, families, groups, and even species. However, later on, he concedes that most biologists remain unconvinced by Wynne-Edwards's formulation of group selection, noting the strong opposition of biologists such as David Lack and George C. Williams and such philosophers/historians of biology as Michael Ruse. At the same time, the author maintains, there is a greater acceptance of a hierarchical approach to evolutionary theory. He also discusses the role of ideology in the debate over group selection. This book is a fascinating study, with special appeal to historians and philosophers of biology. Summing Up; Recommended. Upper-division undergraduates and above. J. S. Schwartz emeritus, CUNY College of Staten Island

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Choice Review