Habeas corpus after 9/11 : confronting America's new global detention system /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Hafetz, Jonathan.
Imprint:New York : New York University Press, [2011]
©2011
Description:1 online resource (ix, 323 pages)
Language:English
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/11234008
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:9780814773437
0814773435
9780814790793
0814790798
9780814737033
081473703X
Notes:Includes bibliographical references and index.
Online resource; title from PDF title page (JSTOR, viewed June 11, 2020).
Summary:This book is an examination of the rise of the U.S.-run global detention system that emerged after 9/11 and the efforts to challenge it through habeas corpus (a petition filed in court claiming unlawful imprisonment).
Other form:Print version: Hafetz, Jonathan. Habeas corpus after 9/11. New York : New York University Press, ©2011 9780814737033
Review by Choice Review

Habeas corpus is a fundamental right in the US Constitution whose origins go back to British common law. It is the right to be brought before a judge to determine the legality of one's incarceration. Throughout US history, including the Civil War and WW I and II, habeas corpus was respected and defended by the courts. Yet the terrorist attacks of 9/11, and the Bush administration's decision to incarcerate enemy combatants at Guantanamo Bay without trial, tested the scope and commitment of this constitutional right. Hafetz's book is an excellent account of the five major Supreme Court cases addressing habeas corpus and constitutional rights to a fair trial after 9/11. Hafetz (Seton Hall Law School) explores how the Bush-declared War on Terror challenged and bypassed habeas corpus. He does this by explaining the Bush administration's legal arguments for detention without trial, how it contended that global terrorism necessitated new national security methods, and how it responded to the different Supreme Court decisions by shifting legal arguments and tactics. The book concludes by asserting that the Obama administration has mostly continued the Bush arguments and practices. Excellent for collections on law, terrorism, and national security. Summing Up: Highly recommended. All readership levels. D. Schultz Hamline University

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Choice Review