Review by Choice Review
Crowley (English, Arizona State Univ.) offers an ambitious examination of two competing belief systems, American liberalism and Christian fundamentalism. Early chapters draw on ancient, classical, and modern rhetorical theory and trace the historical evolution of each system. The author argues that American liberals base their premises on reason and are consequently at a loss when attempting fruitful debate with Christian fundamentalists moved more by notions of biblical inerrancy than by empirical fact. In later chapters Crowley theorizes that "apocalyptism" is becoming increasingly mainstream, and she attributes the political success of Republican conservatives over the last couple of decades to "apocalyptist" beliefs and values. To facilitate debate, the author offers rhetorical strategies meant to evoke passion more often than reason. Although she defines her terms well, the book is dense with rhetorical theory and terminology. Her review of revisionist conspiracy theory seems to wander a bit from core concepts outlined in other chapters. Those comfortable comparing elements of theory from Aristotle, Lacan, Foucault, and Derrida will consider this book an impressive exploration of the underpinnings of the ideology of contemporary American fundamentalists. ^BSumming Up: Recommended. Graduate students, researchers, and faculty. C. E. O'Neill New Mexico State University at Carlsbad
Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Choice Review
