Moral imagination : implications of cognitive science for ethics /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Johnson, Mark, 1949-
Imprint:Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1997.
Description:1 online resource
Language:English
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/11241143
Hidden Bibliographic Details
Varying Form of Title:Implications of cognitive science for ethics
ISBN:9780226223230
022622323X
9780226401690
9780226401683
0226401685
0226401693
Notes:Includes bibliographical references and index.
Online resource; title from PDF title page (EBSCO; viewed on March 9, 2015).
Summary:Preface Acknowledgments Introduction: How Cognitive Science Changes Ethics 1: Reason as Force: The Moral Law Folk Theory 2: Metaphoric Morality 3: The Metaphoric Basis of Moral Theory 4: Beyond Rules 5: The Impoverishment of Reason: Our Enlightenment Legacy 6: What's Wrong with the Objectivist Self 7: The Narrative Context of Self and Action 8: Moral Imagination 9: Living without Absolutes: Objectivity and the Conditions for Criticism 10: Preserving Our Best Enlightenment Moral Ideals Notes Index.
Other form:Print version: Johnson, Mark. Moral Imagination : Implications of Cognitive Science for Ethics. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, ©2014 9780226401683
Review by Choice Review

Johnson (The Body in the Mind, CH, Dec'87) makes a sustained critique of Enlightenment ethics by showing that its conception of morality as following universal rational laws is a psychological and cognitive impossibility for humans. Using recent work in cognitive science, Johnson reveals how humans, as embodied beings, must use frame semantics, prototypes, and narratives (among other procedures) to comprehend moral situations and themselves as moral agents. These processes all rely on metaphor and, hence, morality cannot be a product of abstract reason but is a construction of moral imagination. Moral imagination is neither irrational nor a matter of personal feeling, as the Enlightenment thought, but a process that uses all of the cognitive and emotional powers of the mind and can be objectively (but not finally and absolutely) assessed on various grounds, including the wealth of imaginative possibilities opened up, how well its values meet basic human needs, how they fit into and extend the moral tradition of which they are a part, and whether they contain a concrete respect for all persons. Johnson's critique of Enlightenment moral theory from the perspective of cognitive science is acute and telling; his exploration of the possibilities of moral imagination promising. Highly recommended for college and university libraries. J. H. Riker; Colorado College

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Choice Review