Health, Luck, and Justice.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Segall, Shlomi, 1970- author.
Imprint:Princeton : Princeton University Press, 2009.
Description:1 online resource (253 pages)
Language:English
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/11282983
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:9780691140537
0691140537
9781400831715
1400831717
Digital file characteristics:data file
Notes:Includes bibliographical references (pages 231-234) and index.
English.
Print version record.
Summary:Luck egalitarianism--the idea that justice requires correcting disadvantages resulting from brute luck--has gained ground in recent years and is now the main rival to John Rawls's theory of distributive justice. Health, Luck, and Justice is the first attempt to systematically apply luck egalitarianism to the just distribution of health and health care. Challenging Rawlsian approaches to health policy, Shlomi Segall develops an account of just health that is sensitive to considerations of luck and personal responsibility, arguing that people's health and the health care they receive are just only when society works to neutralize the effects of bad luck.
Other form:Print version: Segall, Shlomi, 1970- Health, luck, and justice. Princeton ; Oxford : Princeton University Press, ©2010
Review by Choice Review

Segall (Hebrew Univ. of Jerusalem) explicates the "luck egalitarian" theory of justice developed in response to John Rawls's work on justice. The author applies luck egalitarianism, albeit in modified form with some important constructive corrections, to important ethical and allocation issues that arise in the health care setting. The theory balances individual responsibility for maintaining one's health with a commitment to providing all individuals with a basic level of care. Segall ably defends why she thinks luck egalitarian theory, with important modifications to prevent the total abandonment of patients, provides a better solution for problems in health care allocation than other theories of justice do. This important, thought-provoking book is distinctive in defending the claim that so-called enhancement technologies should be made available to some as a matter of justice. Despite Segall's attempts to explain clearly the various positions on justice, those who are unfamiliar with these philosophical debates will have difficulty in completely appreciating this work Those who are up to the challenge will be richly rewarded by its insightful analysis. Summing Up: Recommended. Graduate students through professionals/practitioners. A. W. Klink Duke University

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Choice Review