The keys to effective schools : educational reform as continuous improvement /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Edition:2nd ed.
Imprint:Thousand Oaks, CA : Corwin Press, 2007.
Description:1 online resource (xxvii, 215 pages)
Language:English
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/11285595
Hidden Bibliographic Details
Other authors / contributors:Hawley, Willis D.
National Educational Association (U.S.)
ISBN:9781441628428
1441628428
9781483329512
1483329518
1412941008
9781412941006
1412941016
9781412941013
1452280800
9781452280806
9781452213477
145221347X
Notes:"A Joint Publication with National Education Association and Corwin Press."
Includes bibliographical references and index.
English.
Print version record.
Summary:Working in tandem with the National Education Association's KEYS initiative (Keys to Excellence in Your Schools), this second edition focuses on how to change a school's organizational structure and culture to improve the quality of teaching and learning. It is intended for educators, policymakers, and parents.
Other form:Print version: Keys to effective schools. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA : Corwin Press, 2007 9781412941006
Review by Choice Review

In a chapter-ending footnote contributor Newmann notes, "... an effective school is one with a record of high student achievement on either conventional tests or more authentic assessments." Even alternative educational assessment champions (readers may wish to consult Harold Berlak et. al. Toward a New Science of Educational Testing and Measurement; 1992) allow that the coin of the realm in school effectiveness is students' test scores. Therefore, one can be forgiven for assuming from the title, The Keys to Effective Schools that they are intent on documenting from the research how schools of high-performing students differ from others. Actually, the book was commissioned to support a National Educational Association initiative. Having identified what association leaders believe to be the most important characteristics of school quality, the editor has collected chapters supporting those positions. Some (notably Chapter 5) are entirely without documentation. Others (the Murphy and Alexander chapter, for instance) are very well documented. If the publication is viewed as a series of position papers rather than an objective compilation of research, it has a place in academic collections. ^BSumming Up: Recommended. Upper-division undergraduates and above. D. E. Tanner California State University, Fresno

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Choice Review