Compensatory lengthening : phonetics, phonology, diachrony /
Saved in:
| Author / Creator: | Kavitskaya, Darya, 1969- |
|---|---|
| Imprint: | New York : Routledge, 2002. |
| Description: | 1 online resource (xii, 224 pages) |
| Language: | English |
| Series: | Outstanding dissertations in linguistics Outstanding dissertations in linguistics. |
| Subject: | |
| Format: | E-Resource Book |
| URL for this record: | http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/11304114 |
Table of Contents:
- Cover; Title Page; Copyright Page; Table of Contents; Acknowledgments; Preface; Chapter 1. Introduction; 1.1 Defining compensatory lengthening; 1.2 Theoretical approaches to compensatory lengthening: an overview; 1.3. CVC and CVCV CL diachronically: the phonologization model; 1.3.1. Origins of CVC CL; 1.3.2. Origins of CVCV CL; 1.3.3. Listener-oriented sound change; 1.4. CVC vs. CVCV CL: synchronic divergence; 1.5. Organization of the dissertation; Chapter 2. Conservation Approaches to Compensatory Lengthening; 2.1. Introduction; 2.2. Autosegmental phonology.
- 2.3. Moraic approach to compensatory lengthening2.3.1. Moraic theory: an overview; 2.3.2. Moraic approach: predictions and problems; 2.3.2.1. Independent weight distinction; 2.3.2.2. Onset deletion; 2.3.2.3. Intervening segments; 2.3.2.4. Adjacency; 2.3.2.5. Directionality; 2.4. Conclusions; Chapter 3. Conditions on CVC Compensatory Lengthening; 3.1. Introduction; 3.2. Phonologization of coda loss; 3.2.1. Glides; 3.2.1.1. Turkish: postvocalic glide loss; 3.2.1.2. Kabardian: postvocalic glide loss; 3.2.1.3. Ngajan: postvocalic glide loss; 3.2.1.4. Ancient Greek: postconsonantal glide loss.
- 3.2.2. Liquids3.2.2.1. l-deletion in Komi; 3.2.2.2. Liquid deletion in Ngajan; 3.2.2.3. Loss of r in Turkish; 3.2.3. Nasals; 3.2.3.1. Ancient Greek: preconsonantal nasal loss; 3.2.3.2. Latin: preconsonantal nasal loss; 3.2.3.3. Lithuanian: preconsonantal and word-final nasal loss; 3.2.3.4. Germanic: pre-fricative nasal loss; 3.2.3.5. Prenasalization: Bantu; 3.2.4. Fricatives; 3.2.4.1. Turkish; 3.2.4.2. Persian; 3.2.4.3. Kabardian; 3.2.4.4. Greek; 3.2.4.5. Latin; 3.2.5. Stops; 3.2.5.1. CL through g-loss: Turkish; 3.2.5.2. CL through g-loss: West Saxon; 3.3. Apparent counterexamples.
- 3.3.1. Glottal stop3.3.1.1. Ket; 3.3.1.2. Tehrani Farsi; 3.3.1.3. Implications of the analysis; 3.3.2. Hebrew: morphological compensatory lengthening; 3.3.3. Indo-Aryan: lengthening through degemination; 3.4. CL through onset loss; 3.4.1. Romanesco Italian; 3.4.2. Samothraki Greek; 3.4.3. Onondaga; 3.4.4. Summary; 3.5. Conclusions; Chapter 4. Conditions on CVCV Compensatory Lengthening; 4.1. Introduction; 4.2. Phonetic motivations for CVCV CL: the phonologization model; 4.3. Case study 1: compensatory lengthening in Friulian; 4.3.1. Data; 4.3.2. Phonologization of vowel length.
- 4.3.3. An alternative account of vowel lengthening in Friulian4.4. Case Study 2: vowel lengthening in Late Common Slavic; 4.4.1. Conditions on Slavic lengthening; 4.4.2. Segmental conditions; 4.4.2.1. Intervening consonants; 4.4.2.2. The identity of the lengthened vowel; 4.4.2.3. Jers and closed syllables; 4.4.2.4. Local conclusion; 4.4.3. Prosodic conditions; 4.4.3.1. Slavic accentuation; 4.4.3.2. Lengthening under the falling accent; 4.4.3.3. Lengthening under the new rising accent; 4.4.4. Concluding remarks for the Slavic case study; 4.5. Directionality and CVCV: apparent counterexamples.