Chinese law in imperial eyes : sovereignty, justice, and transcultural politics /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Chen, Li (Professor of History and Sociolegal Studies), author.
Imprint:New York : Columbia University Press, [2016]
©2016
Description:1 online resource (xii, 400 pages) : illustrations
Language:English
Series:Studies of the Weatherhead East Asian Institute, Columbia University
Studies of the Weatherhead East Asian Institute, Columbia University.
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/11405456
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:9780231540216
0231540213
9780231173742
0231173741
Digital file characteristics:text file PDF
Notes:Includes bibliographical references and index.
In English.
Print version record.
Summary:"How did American schoolchildren, French philosophers, Russian Sinologists, Dutch merchants, and British lawyers imagine China and Chinese law? What happened when agents of presumably dominant Western empires had to endure the humiliations and anxieties of maintaining a profitable but precarious relationship with China? In Chinese Law in Imperial Eyes, Li Chen provides a richly textured analysis of these related issues and their intersection with law, culture, and politics in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Using a wide array of sources, Chen's study focuses on the power dynamics of Sino-Western relations during the formative century before the First Opium War (1839-1842). He highlights the centrality of law to modern imperial ideology and politics and brings new insight to the origins of comparative Chinese law in the West, the First Opium War, and foreign extraterritoriality in China. The shifting balance of economic and political power formed and transformed knowledge of China and Chinese law in different contact zones. Chen argues that recovering the variegated and contradictory roles of Chinese law in Western "modernization" helps provincialize the subsequent Euro-Americentric discourse of global modernity. Chen draws attention to important yet underanalyzed sites in which imperial sovereignty, national identity, cultural tradition, or international law and order were defined and restructured. His valuable case studies show how constructed differences between societies were hardened into cultural or racial boundaries and then politicized to rationalize international conflicts and hierarchy."--Publisher's description.
Other form:Print version: Chen, Li (Professor of History and Sociolegal Studies). Chinese law in imperial eyes. New York : Columbia University Press, [2016] 9780231173742
Standard no.:10.7312/chen17374
Review by Choice Review

Using an array of sources, this book surveys the production, distribution, and institutionalization of the discourse on Chinese law and society in the 18th and 19th centuries. Chen (Univ. of Toronto, International Society for Chinese Law and History) examines the formation and transformation of Western knowledge and the perception of Chinese law and society over time. He argues that Western discourse on China and Chinese law was central to many of the disputes that structured the trajectory of modern Sino-Western relations. That discourse was also a key site at which the cultural and national boundaries were constructed or negotiated. Chen studies Western representations of Chinese law and society as both produced by and productive of the historical processes and forces that shaped Sino-Western encounters of the 18th and 19th centuries. The book helps restore the centrality of law in the history of modern Sino-Western relations. It enriches discourses on legal, intellectual, and political dimensions of modern Sino-Western relations. The book is thoroughly researched--more than one-third of pages are devoted to notes and bibliography. Recommended to those who are interested in China's legal history and Sino-Western relations. Summing Up: Recommended. Upper-division undergraduates through faculty. --Zhiqun Zhu, Bucknell University

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Choice Review