High-table diplomacy : the reshaping of international security institutions /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Engelbrekt, Kjell, author.
Imprint:Washington, D.C. : Georgetown University Press, 2016.
Description:1 online resource (xxi, 250 pages)
Language:English
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/11406990
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:9781626163140
1626163146
162616312X
9781626163126
9781626163126
9781626163133
1626163138
Notes:Includes bibliographical references and index.
Print version record.
Summary:Today, great-power and middle-power diplomacy take place at two high tables, one using a well-known fixed address on First Avenue in Manhattan and the other at varrying summit locations where heads of state and government meet. This book examines the growing importance of minilateral summit diplomacy in the management of international security problems. Kjell Engelbrekt contrasts the "GX" summitry of the G7 (formerly the G8) and G20 clubs with the older and more formal UN Security Council. He examines whether or not this new form of GX high-table diplomacy offers a more effective alternative to, or whether it simply complements, traditional institutions. One defining feature of GX diplomacy has been the diversification of countries with seat at the table, as seen by contrasting the G20 with the five-member UN Security Council. A second feature of GX summits are their relative informality and flexibility, which has helped put non-traditional security threats on the agenda. Engelbrekt conducted research in primary-source documents of the G7, G8, G20, and UN Security Council to examine and contrast how these institutions have deliberated on three policy areas: conflict management, counterterrorism cooperation, and climate change mitigation.
Other form:Print version: Engelbrekt, Kjell. High-table diplomacy. Washington, D.C. : Georgetown University Press, [2016] 9781626163126
Review by Choice Review

Starting with the assumption that broad multilateral diplomacy has limited effectiveness, Engelbrekt (Swedish Defence Univ.) explores "minilateralism"--narrower meetings involving a small number of key states. He compares formal minilateral bodies, exemplified by the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), with informal minilateral summits, such as the G7, G8, and G20, investigating whether the groups maintain exclusive jurisdiction of issues or pursue complementary efforts. Asserting that formal processes provide an entity with greater legitimacy, whereas informality permits flexibility helpful to practical effectiveness, he also reviews internal trade-offs within both groups. Through a descriptive narrative, Engelbrekt examines these ideas by focusing on three topics: traditional conflict management, counterterrorism, and climate change. The book is written in a style suited for academics and specialists rather than undergraduates. Rife with professional jargon and acronyms, the strength of the work is the painstakingly detailed recounting of diplomatic efforts in these forums from 2009 to 2014. Summing Up: Recommended. Upper-division undergraduates through faculty. --Clifton W. Sherrill, Troy University

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Choice Review