Legally wed : same-sex marriage and the Constitution /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Strasser, Mark Philip, 1955-
Imprint:Ithaca, N.Y. : Cornell University Press, ©1997.
Description:1 online resource (x, 241 pages)
Language:English
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/11678146
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:9781501717727
1501717723
0801434068
9780801434068
0801484294
9780801484292
Digital file characteristics:data file
Notes:Includes bibliographical references (pages 209-235) and index.
Restrictions unspecified
Electronic reproduction. [Place of publication not identified] : HathiTrust Digital Library, 2010.
Master and use copy. Digital master created according to Benchmark for Faithful Digital Reproductions of Monographs and Serials, Version 1. Digital Library Federation, December 2002. http://purl.oclc.org/DLF/benchrepro0212
digitized 2010 HathiTrust Digital Library committed to preserve
Print version record.
Summary:Mark Strasser examines the issue of same-sex marriage in light of contemporary constitutional and domestic relations law, showing why the usual arguments against the state's recognizing such unions are either weak or irrelevant. The Supreme Court has articulated numerous interests promoted by marriage, all of which apply to same-sex as well as opposite-sex couples. According to Strasser, the argument made most frequently to deny recognition to same-sex unions - that marriage exists to provide a setting for the production and raising of children - is in fact a reason to acknowledge such unions. The claim that marriage is for children biologically related to both parents is refuted in the case law, which treats biological and adopted children as legally indistinguishable.
Strasser explains Baehr v. Lewin, the precedent-setting case in Hawaii, and addresses the implications of state-by-state decisions to ban or recognize same-sex unions. He analyzes what it would mean to say that a policy violates the Equal Protection or Due Process Clauses of the Constitution, and compares biased policies that target gays and lesbians with those that victimize racial minorities. Strasser argues that the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is both unconstitutional and a public policy disaster. Arguably, it does not give states additional rights with respect to which marriages they need not recognize, but only with respect to which divorces they need not recognize. For example, DOMA seems to allow an individual to avoid a court-imposed duty to support an ex-spouse simply by changing his or her domicile. Moreover, Strasser argues, DOMA is an open invitation for states to demand exceptions that will wreak havoc in domestic relations law.
In a reasoned response to conservative arguments about marriage, Legally Wed explicates established and evolving legal principles, and shows how invidiously these have been applied to the issues of gay rights in general and same-sex unions in particular.
Other form:Print version: Strasser, Mark Philip, 1955- Legally wed. Ithaca, N.Y. : Cornell University Press, ©1997 0801434068
Review by Choice Review

Strasser provides an excellent review and analysis of the constitutional arguments surrounding the same-sex marriage issue and the nonconstitutional arguments that have been introduced into the constitutional debate. He delineates the argument by systematically discussing the issues: the definition of marriage; the equal protection clause and how the courts have applied tests of strict scrutiny, heightened scrutiny, and rational basis; the due process clause, including the fundamental interest of the state in marriage and the right to choose whom to marry; custody and adoption issues and family structure; the "full faith and credit" clause, which reserves powers to the states; and the "defense of marriage" act, which Strasser argues is unconstitutional based on the full faith and credit clause. The book is exceptional in its comprehensive citation of cases from all levels of courts and in its footnotes of materials and arguments, and an excellent constitutional argument that captures the context of the issue. Accessibly written and appropriate for all levels, from general readers to students, researchers, and practitioners. E. D. Riggle; University of Kentucky

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Library Journal Review

Strasser (law, Capital Univ., Columbus, Ohio) here analyzes the arguments against same-sex marriage one by one and concludes that none achieves legal credibility. He reviews the bars on marriage based on definition, procreation, custody, and protection of children and the debates centered on equal protection. Looking at the recently passed Defense of Marriage Act, he concludes that it may be unconstitutional. The logic of the case presented by Strasser will be debated by lawyers and its success or failure decided by judges in the years to come. As such, this is of great current relevance, but much of the material has already appeared in law reviews, and the legal language may make it more appropriate for special and academic collections. Public libraries should consider Andrew Sullivan's Same-Sex Marriage, Pro and Con (LJ 3/15/97).‘Jeffery Ingram, Newport P.L., Ore. (c) Copyright 2010. Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.

(c) Copyright Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.
Review by Choice Review


Review by Library Journal Review