Democratic acceptance of spatial planning policy measures /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Pleger, Lyn Ellen, author.
Imprint:Cham, Switzerland : Springer, [2019]
Description:1 online resource
Language:English
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/11745247
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:9783319908786
3319908782
9783319908779
3319908774
9783319908779
Digital file characteristics:text file PDF
Notes:Online resource; title from PDF title page (SpringerLink, viewed June 21, 2018).
Summary:This book examines the democratic acceptance of spatial planning measures, using Switzerland as a case study. The currently inefficient land use in industrialised countries calls for new spatial planning policies. Yet governments have largely failed to implement innovative policy measures, which may be due to a lack of democratic acceptance. To date, little is known about the democratic acceptance of spatial planning measures. Switzerland offers a promising candidate because of its direct-democratic system, which allows citizens' preferences for specific policy measures to be directly measured. In this work, the democratic acceptance of spatial planning instruments is investigated from various perspectives in the form of original empirical studies, which are embedded in an innovative conceptual framework. It demonstrates that not only spatial planning instruments in general, but also incentive-based instruments in particular, generally enjoy high acceptance. This finding is remarkable, considering the fact that efficient land use instruments have only been marginally implemented. Addressing the needs of both academics and land use practitioners in the private and public sector, the book shows that in order to improve the democratic acceptance of spatial planning measures, attention must be paid to their context, content and the means by which that content is provided.
Other form:Printed edition: 9783319908779
Standard no.:10.1007/978-3-319-90878-6

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000Ii 4500
001 11745247
005 20210625184933.7
006 m o d
007 cr cnu---unuuu
008 180619s2019 sz o 000 0 eng d
015 |a GBB8M3897  |2 bnb 
016 7 |a 019138693  |2 Uk 
019 |a 1084339513  |a 1203994966  |a 1223981300 
020 |a 9783319908786  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 3319908782  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |z 9783319908779  |q (print) 
020 |a 3319908774 
020 |a 9783319908779 
024 7 |a 10.1007/978-3-319-90878-6  |2 doi 
035 |a (OCoLC)1041108938  |z (OCoLC)1084339513  |z (OCoLC)1203994966  |z (OCoLC)1223981300 
035 9 |a (OCLCCM-CC)1041108938 
037 |a com.springer.onix.9783319908786  |b Springer Nature 
040 |a N$T  |b eng  |e rda  |e pn  |c N$T  |d GW5XE  |d N$T  |d OCLCA  |d OCLCF  |d MERER  |d OCLCQ  |d UKMGB  |d CAUOI  |d UX1  |d COO  |d OCLCQ  |d VT2  |d AU@  |d DCT  |d ORZ 
043 |a e-sz--- 
049 |a MAIN 
050 4 |a HT169.S9 
072 7 |a POL  |x 002000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a RP  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a RP  |2 thema 
100 1 |a Pleger, Lyn Ellen,  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Democratic acceptance of spatial planning policy measures /  |c Lyn Ellen Pleger. 
264 1 |a Cham, Switzerland :  |b Springer,  |c [2019] 
300 |a 1 online resource 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
347 |a text file  |b PDF  |2 rda 
588 0 |a Online resource; title from PDF title page (SpringerLink, viewed June 21, 2018). 
505 0 |a Introduction -- Sustainable Spatial Planning in Democracies -- Democratic Acceptance of Spatial Planning Policies -- Determinants of Democratic Acceptance: A Two-Level Analysis -- The Motivation behind Democratic Acceptance: A Case Study -- Framing Effects on Democratic Acceptability: An Experimental Approach -- Discussion.-Conclusions. 
520 |a This book examines the democratic acceptance of spatial planning measures, using Switzerland as a case study. The currently inefficient land use in industrialised countries calls for new spatial planning policies. Yet governments have largely failed to implement innovative policy measures, which may be due to a lack of democratic acceptance. To date, little is known about the democratic acceptance of spatial planning measures. Switzerland offers a promising candidate because of its direct-democratic system, which allows citizens' preferences for specific policy measures to be directly measured. In this work, the democratic acceptance of spatial planning instruments is investigated from various perspectives in the form of original empirical studies, which are embedded in an innovative conceptual framework. It demonstrates that not only spatial planning instruments in general, but also incentive-based instruments in particular, generally enjoy high acceptance. This finding is remarkable, considering the fact that efficient land use instruments have only been marginally implemented. Addressing the needs of both academics and land use practitioners in the private and public sector, the book shows that in order to improve the democratic acceptance of spatial planning measures, attention must be paid to their context, content and the means by which that content is provided. 
650 0 |a City planning  |z Switzerland  |v Case studies. 
650 7 |a POLITICAL SCIENCE  |x Public Policy  |x City Planning & Urban Development.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a Political science & theory.  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a Environmental policy & protocols.  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a Regional & area planning.  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a City planning.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00862177 
651 7 |a Switzerland.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01205401 
655 4 |a Electronic books. 
655 7 |a Case studies.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01423765 
773 0 |t Springer eBooks 
776 0 8 |i Printed edition:  |z 9783319908779 
903 |a HeVa 
929 |a oclccm 
999 f f |i 56cb0a56-983a-58d9-a27d-70bff5f4d9f9  |s 1df164e9-b135-5dc7-8912-ac9ee20afcd5 
928 |t Library of Congress classification  |a HT169.S9  |l Online  |c UC-FullText  |u https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-90878-6  |z Springer Nature  |g ebooks  |i 12554821