Public inquiries, policy learning, and the threat of future crises /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Stark, Alastair, author.
Imprint:Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2018.
©2018
Description:xii, 200 pages : illustrations ; 25 cm
Language:English
Subject:
Format: Print Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/11784658
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:0198831994
9780198831990
Notes:Includes bibliographical references (pages [183]-192) and index.
Summary:In the aftermath of major crises governments turn to public inquiries to learn lessons. Inquiries often challenge established authority, frame heroes and villains in the public spotlight and deliver courtroom-like drama to hungry journalists. As such, they can become high-profile political stories in their own right. Inquiries also have a policy learning mandate with big implications because they are ultimately responsible for identifying policy lessons which, if implemented, should keep us safe from the next big event. However, despite their high-profile nature and their position as the pre-eminent means of learning about crises, we still know very little about what inquiries produce in terms of learning and what factors influence their effectiveness in this0regard. 0In light of this, the question that animates this book is as important as it is simple. Can post-crisis inquiries deliver effective lesson-learning which will reduce our vulnerability to future threats? Conventional wisdom suggests that the answer to this question should be an emphatic no. Outside of the academy, for example, inquiries are regularly vilified as costly wastes of time that illuminate very little while inside social scientists echo similar concerns, regularly describing inquiries as unhelpful. These commentaries, however, lack robust, generalizable evidence to support their claims. This volume provides evidence from the first international comparison of post-crisis inquiries in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom, which shows that, contrary to conventional wisdom, the post-crisis inquiry is an effective means of policy learning after crises and that they consistently encourage policy reforms that enhance our resilience to future threats.

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000 i 4500
001 11784658
003 ICU
005 20190329111328.1
008 180522t20182018enka b 001 0 eng
010 |a 2018945606 
020 |a 0198831994 
020 |a 9780198831990 
035 |a (OCoLC)1088668333 
040 |a DLC  |b eng  |e rda  |c DLC 
042 |a pcc 
050 0 0 |a K3402  |b .S73 2018 
090 |a XXK3402  |b .S73 2018 
100 1 |a Stark, Alastair,  |e author.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2014062680 
245 1 0 |a Public inquiries, policy learning, and the threat of future crises /  |c Alastair Stark. 
264 1 |a Oxford :  |b Oxford University Press,  |c 2018. 
264 |a ©2018 
300 |a xii, 200 pages :  |b illustrations ;  |c 25 cm 
336 |a text  |2 rdacontent  |0 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/contentTypes/txt 
337 |a unmediated  |2 rdamedia  |0 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/mediaTypes/n 
338 |a volume  |2 rdacarrier  |0 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/carriers/nc 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (pages [183]-192) and index. 
505 0 |a Failing to learn : the state or the academy -- Types of policy learning and the inquiry process -- Inquiry agent and their logics for action -- Priming the analysis -- Lesson- learning and resilience to future crises -- Crafting and forgetting policy lessons -- Logics for action and conventional wisdom. 
520 8 |a In the aftermath of major crises governments turn to public inquiries to learn lessons. Inquiries often challenge established authority, frame heroes and villains in the public spotlight and deliver courtroom-like drama to hungry journalists. As such, they can become high-profile political stories in their own right. Inquiries also have a policy learning mandate with big implications because they are ultimately responsible for identifying policy lessons which, if implemented, should keep us safe from the next big event. However, despite their high-profile nature and their position as the pre-eminent means of learning about crises, we still know very little about what inquiries produce in terms of learning and what factors influence their effectiveness in this0regard. 0In light of this, the question that animates this book is as important as it is simple. Can post-crisis inquiries deliver effective lesson-learning which will reduce our vulnerability to future threats? Conventional wisdom suggests that the answer to this question should be an emphatic no. Outside of the academy, for example, inquiries are regularly vilified as costly wastes of time that illuminate very little while inside social scientists echo similar concerns, regularly describing inquiries as unhelpful. These commentaries, however, lack robust, generalizable evidence to support their claims. This volume provides evidence from the first international comparison of post-crisis inquiries in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom, which shows that, contrary to conventional wisdom, the post-crisis inquiry is an effective means of policy learning after crises and that they consistently encourage policy reforms that enhance our resilience to future threats. 
650 0 |a Governmental investigations  |x Evaluation  |v Cross-cultural studies. 
650 0 |a Governmental investigations  |x Moral and ethical aspects  |v Cross-cultural studies. 
903 |a HeVa 
903 |a HeVa 
929 |a cat 
999 |n 514-0  |c JRL  |r 170 
999 f f |i 4a95962a-1828-5430-9339-67afe320a647  |s 847eaf1f-f618-503c-9145-1c17a85d4999 
928 |t Library of Congress classification  |a XXK3402.S73 2018  |l DLL  |c DLL-Law  |i 11237190 
927 |t Library of Congress classification  |a XXK3402.S73 2018  |l DLL  |c DLL-Law  |e FULT  |b 106298686  |i 10080376