Review by Choice Review
In this deeply thoughtful, conceptually sharp survey of legal and philosophical issues related to mass atrocities, May (Vanderbilt Univ.) ranges from highly theoretical questions, such as whether genocide is the most serious of all crimes, to generally neglected practical and moral questions. Legal issues related to Rwanda's genocide are most often cited to illustrate political realities. May articulates the need for criminal trials to promote reconciliation in postgenocide societies, and says that concepts such as instigation, incitement, and complicity must be untangled. He suggests that genocide be redefined to include more than just four categories of victimized groups. He also considers the criminality of cultural genocide. May forces readers to reconsider assumptions that presently shape international diplomacy in response to genocide. Many of his proposals are unlikely to result in institutional change, but his arguments are profound and will be useful if and when international agents adjust legal and political arrangements related to crimes involving mass violence. Specialized academics interested in the phenomenon of genocide should eagerly consume this book; they will find it most provocative and useful. Summing Up: Highly recommended. Graduate and research collections. P. G. Conway SUNY College at Oneonta
Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Choice Review
