Argumentation in political deliberation /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Imprint:Amsterdam, Netherlands ; Philadelphia, PA : John Benjamins Publishing Company, [2015]
Description:1 online resource.
Language:English
Series:Benjamins current topics, 1874-0081 ; 76
Benjamins current topics, 1874-0081 ; 76.
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/11907432
Hidden Bibliographic Details
Other authors / contributors:Lewinski, Marcin, editor.
Mohammed, Dima, editor.
ISBN:9789027268273
9027268274
9789027242648
Notes:Includes bibliographical references and index.
Print version record and CIP data provided by publisher.
Summary:Dialectical approaches traditionally conceptualize argumentation as a discussion in which two parties debate on "two sides of an issue" (pro and con). However, many political issues engender multiple positions. This is clear in multi-party online deliberations in which often an array of competing positions is debated in one and the same discussion. A proponent of a given position thus addresses a number of possible opponents, who in turn may hold incompatible opinions. The goal of this chapter is to shed extra light on such "polylogical" clash of opinions in online deliberation, by examining t.
Other form:Print version: Argumentation in political deliberation. Amsterdam ; Philadelphia : John Benjamins Publishing Company, [2015] 9789027242648
Table of Contents:
  • -1. Prelim pages
  • 0. Table of contents
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Articles
  • 3. Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse in political deliberation
  • 4. Strategic maneuvering in European Parliamentary Debate
  • 5. Pursuing multiple goals in European Parliamentary Debates
  • 6. The\place of counter discourse in two methods of public deliberation
  • 7. Deliberation digitized
  • 8. (How) do participants in online discussion forums create `echo chambers'?
  • 9. Debating multiple positions in multi-party online deliberation
  • 10. Subject index