Ctrl + Z : the right to be forgotten /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Jones, Meg Leta, author.
Imprint:New York ; London : New York University Press, [2016]
Description:1 online resource (xiii, 269 pages)
Language:English
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/11909323
Hidden Bibliographic Details
Varying Form of Title:Ctrl plus Z
Right to be forgotten
Control + Z
Control plus Z
ISBN:9781479801510
1479801518
9781479881703
1479881708
Notes:Includes bibliographical references (pages 233-252) and index.
English.
Print version record.
Summary:"This is going on your permanent record!" is a threat that has never held more weight than it does in the Internet Age, when information lasts indefinitely. The ability to make good on that threat is as democratized as posting a Tweet or making blog. Data about us is created, shared, collected, analyzed, and processed at an overwhelming scale. The damage caused can be severe, affecting relationships, employment, academic success, and any number of other opportunities--and it can also be long lasting. One possible solution to this threat? A digital right to be forgotten, which would in turn create a legal duty to delete, hide, or anonymize information at the request of another user. The highly controversial right has been criticized as a repugnant affront to principles of expression and access, as unworkable as a technical measure, and as effective as trying to put the cat back in the bag. Ctrl+Z breaks down the debate and provides guidance for a way forward. It argues that the existing perspectives are too limited, offering easy forgetting or none at all. By looking at new theories of privacy and organizing the many potential applications of the right, law and technology scholar Meg Leta Jones offers a set of nuanced choices. To help us choose, she provides a digital information life cycle, reflects on particular legal cultures, and analyzes international interoperability. In the end, the right to be forgotten can be innovative, liberating, and globally viable.
Other form:Print version: Jones, Meg Leta. Ctrl + Z. 9781479881703
Standard no.:99972349445
Review by Choice Review

The internet never forgets. Despite technical limitations of "link rot" and "data degradation," the collective memory of the Internet has a remarkable way of maintaining information that once published can remain forever tied to an individual. Yet freedom of speech comes into conflict with privacy and personal reputation when one considers solutions such as a proposed "right to be forgotten." Jones (communication, culture, and technology, Georgetown Univ.) objectively and methodically examines the legal and cultural complexities involved, contrasting US practice and history with that of Europe. Though portions of the book--those covering what may be unfamiliar court cases and law--will seem dense, in these the author is laying the foundation for an approachable conversation on a very complex subject. The importance of digital information stewardship becomes clear: the solution is not simple and depends greatly on local cultural norms and legal history. This book makes an important contribution to the conversation around online privacy, and provides a review of legal issues both domestic and international. Summing Up: Highly recommended. Lower-division undergraduates through faculty. --Jonathan M. Smith, Sonoma State University

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by New York Times Review

This survey of the legal and policy landscape around the "right to be forgotten" in the digital age reads as a painful reminder of why law's that were developed before the invention of photography and sound recording fall short when we consider dignity and privacy today. In his 2009 book "Delete," Viktor Mayer-Schönberger warned that digital networks could "forever tether us to all our past actions, making it impossible, in practice, to escape them." Jones reminds us that this tether is not automatic but a "structure of discoverability" that can be altered. For example, in 2014, Europe's highest court ruled that individuals could ask Google to have negative information removed or "delisted" from search results. What we need, Jones argues, is not complete erasure but "digital redemption," as in the way American bankruptcy laws allow people in debt to start over. Applied to our digital lives, such measures would keep us from being eternally haunted by an embarrassing photograph or ill-advised tweet. The book leaves us wanting more in the way of suggested regulations, but by laying out the terrain so thoughtfully, and highlighting the concepts that should guide our actions, Jones has created the groundwork for a much needed conversation on the profound problem of permanent digital ballasts in the 21st century.

Copyright (c) The New York Times Company [August 11, 2016]
Review by Choice Review


Review by New York Times Review