Boxing Pandora : rethinking borders, states, and secession in a democratic world /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Waters, Timothy William, 1966- author.
Imprint:New Haven : Yale University Press, [2020]
©2020
Description:xiii, 303 pages ; 25 cm.
Language:English
Subject:
Format: Print Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/12006234
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:0300235895
9780300235890
Notes:Includes bibliographical references (pages 275-292) and index.
Summary:A timely and provocative challenge to the foundations of our global order: why should national borders be unchangeable? The inviolability of national borders is an unquestioned pillar of the post-World War II international order. Fixed borders are believed to encourage stability, promote pluralism, and discourage nationalism and intolerance. But do they? What if fixed borders create more problems than they solve, and what if permitting borders to change would create more stability and produce more just societies? Legal scholar Timothy Waters examines this possibility, showing how we arrived at a system of rigidly bordered states and how the real danger to peace is not the desire of people to form new states but the capacity of existing states to resist that desire, even with violence. He proposes a practical, democratically legitimate alternative: a right of secession. With crises ongoing in the United Kingdom, Spain, Ukraine, Iraq, Syria, Sudan, and many other regions, this reassessment of the foundations of our international order is more relevant than ever.
Review by Choice Review

This provocative book is in favor of, well, Balkanization. Conventional defenses of democracy that begin and end with existing states, Waters (Indiana Univ.) argues, are too restrictive. Instead of offering elaborate requirements based on language, ethnicity, and sustainability, he suggests a new rule by which the right to form a new state requires just two things: "physical proximity and a decision to create a political community" (p. 136). Waters offers an interesting, sophisticated historical review of secession and self-determination, with case studies that both support and question the central argument. He concedes that smaller states may be more vulnerable, but he does not devote serious attention to the broader question of size and democracy. Aside from a few references to the Civil War, Waters--like too many students of comparative politics--ignores the case of the US, in particular James Madison's discussion in "Federalist No.10" of the vulnerability of small states to oppressive majorities: the "greater [the] variety of parties and interests ... [the] less probable that a majority of the whole will have a common motive to invade the rights of other citizens." This is a strange omission from an otherwise thorough study. Summing Up: Recommended. Graduate students, researchers, faculty. --Edward V. Schneier, emeritus, City College of the City University of New York

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Choice Review