Another mind-body problem : a history of racial non-being /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Harfouch, John, author.
Imprint:Albany : State University of New York Press, [2018]
©2018
Description:1 online resource (xxxv, 232 pages)
Language:English
Series:SUNY series, philosophy and race
SUNY series, philosophy and race.
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/12019710
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:9781438469973
1438469977
9781438469959
1438469950
Notes:Includes bibliographical references (pages 165-223) and index.
Online resource; title from PDF title page (EBSCO, viewed May 24, 2018).
Summary:Demonstrates the profound overlap of philosophy's mind-body problem and various racist doctrines found in thinkers ranging from Descartes to Kant.
Other form:Print version: Harfouch, John. Another mind-body problem. Albany, NY : State University of New York Press, [2018] 9781438469959
Review by Choice Review

Harfouch (Univ. of Alabama, Huntsville) has written an important book on the intersection of race and the Western construction of the mind-body problem. Looking to statements by individuals such as Malcolm X, Sojourner Truth, and Eric Voegelin, Harfouch examines the positions of "non-being" and "nothingness" involved in race. He considers the embeddedness of human nothingness beginning with Kant's establishment of different races based on intellectual reproduction, and he critiques the racial construction of the mind-body problem and the continued teaching of this construction. In the third and final chapter, he exposes the continued use of this racial nothingness in current developments of race. This book is a significant resource for theorists dealing with race and decolonization issues, but it is more significant for the critique of philosophy itself and the continued teaching of mind-body issues. Readers will need some knowledge of philosophy, but the volume is in general accessible. It should be required reading for scholars of philosophy. Harfouch establishes a logically strong argument and makes a unique contribution to the field. Summing Up: Highly recommended. Upper-division undergraduates through faculty.--Lavonna Lea Lovern, Valdosta State University

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Choice Review