Reinventing Pragmatism : American Philosophy at the End of the Twentieth Century.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Margolis, Joseph.
Imprint:Ithaca : Cornell University Press, 2018.
Description:1 online resource (194 pages)
Language:English
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/12020599
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:9781501728471
1501728474
0801439957
9780801439957
Notes:Print version record.
Summary:In contemporary philosophical debates in the United States "redefining pragmatism" has become the conventional way to flag significant philosophical contests and to launch large conceptual and programmatic changes. This book analyzes the contributions of such developments in light of the classic formulations of Charles S. Peirce and John Dewey and the interaction between pragmatism and analytic philosophy. American pragmatism was revived quite unexpectedly in the 1970s by Richard Rorty's philosophical heterodoxy and his running dispute with Hilary Putnam, who, like Rorty, is a professed Deweyan. Reinventing Pragmatism examines the force of the new pragmatisms, from the emergence of Rorty's and Putnam's basic disagreements of the 1970s until the turn of the century. Joseph Margolis considers the revival of a movement generally thought to have ended by the 1950s as both a surprise and a turn of great importance. The quarrel between Rorty and Putnam obliged American philosophers, and eventually Eurocentric philosophy as a whole, to reconsider the direction of American and European philosophy, for instance in terms of competing accounts of realism and naturalism.
Other form:Print version: Margolis, Joseph. Reinventing Pragmatism : American Philosophy at the End of the Twentieth Century. Ithaca : Cornell University Press, ©2018 9780801439957
Review by Choice Review

Margolis (Temple Univ.) argues that pragmatism (John Dewey's version in particular) was granted renewed life over the past 30 or so years, principally at the hands of Rorty and Putnam. He details the history of the debates generated by these two philosophers, but in a manner that will be comprehensible only to those professionals who have read carefully all the papers and books produced not only by these two, but by Davidson, Quine, Sellars, Dennett, Dummett, and other well-known analytic philosophers. Rorty emerges as the figure most responsible for the revival of interest in pragmatism, and most guilty of distorting the arguments of his opponents and the core of Dewey's pragmatism. Margolis presents his own reading of certain aspects of Dewey and reason to hope for further development of the great themes of fallibilism and relativism. Pragmatism, he contends, is not compatible with the "naturalizing" themes in Quine and Davidson, and the consequences of this fact have yet to be worked out and understood. ^BSumming Up: Recommended. Graduate students through faculty. R. T. Lee Trinity College

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Choice Review