Civil society in investment treaty arbitration : status and prospects /
Saved in:
Author / Creator: | El-Hosseny, Farouk, author. |
---|---|
Imprint: | Leiden : Brill Nijhoff, 2018. |
Description: | 1 online resource |
Language: | English |
Series: | Nijhoff International Investment Law Ser. Nijhoff International Investment Law Ser. |
Subject: | |
Format: | E-Resource Book |
URL for this record: | http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/12398995 |
MARC
LEADER | 00000cam a22000008i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 12398995 | ||
005 | 20210426223906.2 | ||
006 | m o d | ||
007 | cr ||||||||||| | ||
008 | 171028s2018 ne ob 001 0 eng | ||
010 | |a 2017052136 | ||
020 | |a 9789004349131 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
020 | |a 9004349138 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
020 | |z 9789004349124 |q (hardback ; |q alk. paper) | ||
024 | 8 | |a 10.1163/9789004349131 | |
035 | |a (OCoLC)1008758932 | ||
035 | 9 | |a (OCLCCM-CC)1008758932 | |
040 | |a DLC |b eng |e rda |e pn |c DLC |d OCLCO |d OCLCF |d N$T |d YDX |d EBLCP |d UAB |d FIE |d OCLCQ |d OTZ |d UEJ |d U3W |d LEAUB |d OCLCQ |d UKAHL |d NLVRD | ||
042 | |a pcc | ||
049 | |a MAIN | ||
050 | 1 | 0 | |a XXK3830 |
072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 001000 |2 bisacsh | |
072 | 7 | |a LBHT |2 bicssc | |
100 | 1 | |a El-Hosseny, Farouk, |e author. | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Civil society in investment treaty arbitration : |b status and prospects / |c by Farouk El-Hosseny. |
263 | |a 1802 | ||
264 | 1 | |a Leiden : |b Brill Nijhoff, |c 2018. | |
300 | |a 1 online resource | ||
336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a computer |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a online resource |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 1 | |a Nijhoff International Investment Law Ser. | |
504 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index. | ||
588 | 0 | |a Print version record and CIP data provided by publisher; resource not viewed. | |
520 | |a Civil Society in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Status and Prospects offers a procedural and substantive analysis of civil society's participation as amicus curiae before investor-state tribunals.-- |c Provided by Publisher. | ||
505 | 0 | |a Intro -- Civil Society in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Status and Prospects -- Copyright -- Dedication -- Contents -- List of Abbreviations -- Introduction -- 1 Concepts and Definitions -- I The Concept of 'Civil Society' -- II 'Amicus Curiae' and 'Third Party Intervention' Procedures -- 2 Approach and Methodology -- I Approach -- II Methodology -- 3 Structure -- Part 1: Civil Society Participation before Investor-State Tribunals -- Introductory Remarks -- 1 Identifying the 'Public Interest' in an Investor-State Arbitration Context -- 1.1 A Structural Stress Test: 'Public Interest' Pressure on Foreign Investors' Rights and Host States' Obligations -- 1.2 Plenty of 'Hard Law' Rights, Few 'Soft Law' Obligations: A Look at the International Framework on Foreign Investment Protection -- 1.3 Earlier Examples of Public Interest Issues Raised in Investor-State Disputes -- 1.4 Adjudication à sens unique? Some of the Earlier Criticism of Investor-State Tribunals' Awards -- 1.5 Impact of the International Commercial Arbitration Model on Investor-State Arbitration and Civil Society's Role -- 2 Procedural Rules Governing Civil Society's Participation as Amicus Curiae -- 2.1 Acceptance of Civil Society's Participation as Amicus Curiae -- 2.2 Formalization of Amicus Curiae Participation -- The Opening Up to 'Third Persons' -- 3 From Theory to Practice: Investor-State Tribunals' Decisions on Amicus Curiae Participation -- 3.1 Earlier Tribunals Inspired by the Methanex Precedent -- 3.2 Tribunals That Applied Amended and Recently-Adopted Rules -- 3.3 Common (Procedural) Grounds -- 4 Civil Society Participation: Where Procedure Intertwines with Substance -- 4.1 Are Environmental Protection and Human Rights Issues Relevant to the Adjudication of Investor-State Disputes? -- 4.2 The Leitmotiv of Environmental Protection. | |
505 | 8 | |a 4.3 Civil Society as a Human Rights Advocate -- 4.4 Representing the Under-Represented: Civil Society and Indigenous Groups -- 5 An Appraisal of Civil Society's Amicus Curiae Role -- 5.1 Procedural Developments: Amicus Curiae Intervention Crystallized -- 5.2 'Mixed Results' -- Do Investor-State Tribunals Consider Amici's Substantive Arguments? -- 6 Concluding Remarks -- Part 2: Civil Society Participation before Other Jurisdictions: Four Models -- Introductory Remarks -- 1 Absent, but Not Entirely: Indirect Participation at the ICJ -- 1.1 Contentious Proceedings -- 1.2 Advisory Proceedings -- 2 Standing before International Human Rights Jurisdictions -- 2.1 Civil Society as a Victim of Human Rights Violations before the ECtHR -- 2.2 Representation of Victims of Human Rights Violations before the IACtHR and ACHPR -- 3 A 'Friend of the Court' outside the Realm of Investor-State Arbitration -- 3.1 The Amicus Curiae Procedure -- A Common Law Inspiration -- 3.2 WTO Panels and the Appellate Body's Restrictive Approach -- 3.3 International Human Rights Jurisdictions' Liberalism -- 4 The Peculiar Case of Third Party Intervention -- 4.1 Third Party Intervention -- A Look at the US Model -- 4.2 Third Party Intervention as Practiced before International Jurisdictions -- 4.3 Towards a Common Understanding of 'Third Party Intervention'? -- 5 Concluding Remarks -- Part 3: An Enhanced Role for Civil Society before Investor-State Tribunals? -- Introductory Remarks -- 1 Transcending Amicus Curiae Submissions -- 1.1 The Inherent Limitations of the Amicus Curiae Role -- A Comparative Perspective -- 1.2 To be an Amicus or Not to be: Fundamental Differences with Third Party Intervention -- 2 Looking for a Procedure to Uphold Third Parties' Direct Interest in Investor-State Arbitration -- 2.1 The Impossibility of 'Adding Strangers to the Arbitration' -- UPS v. Canada. | |
505 | 8 | |a 2.2 Extreme Circumstances, Standard Limitations -- Aguas del Tunari v. Bolivia -- 2.3 Jurisdictional Barriers Set by the UPS and Bechtel Tribunals -- 3 The Access to Justice Principle: The Basis for Civil Society's Third Party Intervention? -- 3.1 Access to Justice under International Law -- 3.2 Is There a Civil Society Ius Standi before Investor-State Tribunals? -- 4 What Conditions Would Govern Civil Society's Third Party Intervention? -- 4.1 Rationalizing Civil Society's Third Party Intervention in Investor-State Arbitration -- 4.2 Procedural Void and Substantive Barriers: How to Reconcile Third Party Intervention with the Investor-State Arbitration Regime? -- 5 Concluding Remarks -- Conclusion -- Bibliography -- Index. | |
650 | 0 | |a Investments, Foreign |x Law and legislation. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85067737 | |
650 | 0 | |a International commercial arbitration. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85006457 | |
650 | 0 | |a Investments, Foreign (International law) |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85067741 | |
650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Administrative Law & Regulatory Practice. |2 bisacsh | |
650 | 7 | |a International commercial arbitration. |2 fast |0 (OCoLC)fst01377215 | |
650 | 7 | |a Investments, Foreign (International law) |2 fast |0 (OCoLC)fst00978411 | |
650 | 7 | |a Investments, Foreign |x Law and legislation. |2 fast |0 (OCoLC)fst00978387 | |
650 | 7 | |a Foreign direct investment. |2 pplt | |
650 | 7 | |a Investment arbitration. |2 pplt | |
650 | 7 | |a Investor-State dispute settlement. |2 pplt | |
650 | 7 | |a Civil society. |2 pplt | |
655 | 4 | |a Electronic books. | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |a El-Hosseny, Farouk. |t Civil society in investment treaty arbitration. |d Leiden : Brill Nijhoff, 2018 |z 9789004349124 |w (DLC) 2017049402 |
830 | 0 | |a Nijhoff International Investment Law Ser. | |
903 | |a HeVa | ||
929 | |a oclccm | ||
999 | f | f | |i aecc649d-fae7-5fad-b275-319cefe573ed |s 9f7c21c7-b51c-5720-9ca3-7207c8e9c10f |
928 | |t Library of Congress classification |a XXK3830 |l Online |c UC-FullText |u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=e000xna&AN=1703925 |z eBooks on EBSCOhost |g ebooks |i 12457681 |