Sentencing : a social process : re-thinking research and policy /
Saved in:
Author / Creator: | Tata, Cyrus. |
---|---|
Imprint: | Cham : Palgrave Macmillan, 2020. |
Description: | 1 online resource (xiii, 177 pages) |
Language: | English |
Series: | Palgrave Socio-Legal Studies Palgrave Macmillan socio-legal studies. |
Subject: | |
Format: | E-Resource Book |
URL for this record: | http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/12456281 |
MARC
LEADER | 00000cam a2200000Ia 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 12456281 | ||
005 | 20210625185435.9 | ||
006 | m o d | ||
007 | cr un|---aucuu | ||
008 | 200104s2020 sz ob 001 0 eng d | ||
020 | |a 9783030010607 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
020 | |a 3030010600 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
020 | |z 9783030010591 |q (hardbound) | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1134854355 | ||
035 | 9 | |a (OCLCCM-CC)1134854355 | |
040 | |a EBLCP |b eng |e pn |c EBLCP |d OCLCO |d GW5XE |d OCLCF |d N$T |d YDX |d OCLCQ |d QGJ | ||
049 | |a MAIN | ||
050 | 4 | |a XXK5121 | |
050 | 4 | |a HV6001-7220.5 | |
100 | 1 | |a Tata, Cyrus. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2002071566 | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Sentencing : |b a social process : re-thinking research and policy / |c Cyrus Tata. |
260 | |a Cham : |b Palgrave Macmillan, |c 2020. | ||
300 | |a 1 online resource (xiii, 177 pages) | ||
336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 1 | |a Palgrave Socio-Legal Studies | |
588 | 0 | |a Print version record. | |
505 | 0 | |a Intro -- Preface and Acknowledgements -- Praise for Sentencing: A Social Process -- Contents -- List of Tables -- 1 Sentencing Decision-Making: Unravelling the Enigma -- 1 Why Rethink Sentencing Research and Policy? -- 1.1 An Enduring Enigma -- 2 Sentencing as a Social Process: Three Key Qualities -- 2.1 Sentencing Decision-Making Is Neither Magic Nor Machine, but Interpretive -- 2.2 Sentencing Is Processual -- 2.3 Sentencing Is Performative -- 3 The Structure of the Book -- References -- 2 Sentencing Research and Policy: Presumed Autonomous Individualism | |
505 | 8 | |a 1 Two Giants of Sentencing Thought in Combat -- 1.1 The Legal-Rational Tradition -- Juridification -- Transparency -- 1.2 The Judicial-Defensive Tradition -- How the New Penology-Inspired Literature Fortifies the Judicial-Defensive Tradition -- 1.3 The Two Traditions Share the Same Assumptions -- 2 Autonomous Individualism and the Sentencing Cosmos -- 2.1 Separate Autonomous Individual Entities -- 3 Law Versus Discretion: Are Legal Rules and Discretion Really Opposites? -- 3.1 Coercion Versus Freedom: The Autonomous Individual Judge? -- An Asocial Conception of Freedom and Coercion | |
505 | 8 | |a The Self-Possessed Individual -- Discretion as the Personal Property of the Autonomous Individual Judge -- Gender and the Rule-Discretion Binary -- 4 Case Factors: Autonomous Individual Entities? -- 4.1 The Analysis of 'Factors' -- 4.2 Problematising 'Factors' -- 5 Conclusions and Implications -- References -- 3 The Social Production of Sentencing -- 1 How the Discretion-Versus-Rules Binary Dissolves -- 2 The Indivisibility of 'Rules' and 'Facts' -- 2.1 The Devil Is in 'the Facts' -- Case 'Facts' and the Making of Cases -- 2.2 The Devil Is in the Rule-Facts Dialogue | |
505 | 8 | |a 2.3 What Does 'Process' Mean in Sentencing Decision-Making? -- Who Does Sentencing Work? -- 2.4 Multi-conviction Cases -- The Need for Typified Whole Offence Approach -- 2.5 Offender Characteristics -- Offence Versus Offender? -- 3 How Reason-Giving and Accountability Are Socially Produced -- 4 Conclusions and Implications -- References -- 4 The Work of the Sentencing Professions: Animating Autonomous Individualism -- 1 Constituting the Rules-Facts Dialogue: The Role of the Sentencing Professions -- 1.1 Understanding Professional Work: The Problem of Apprehension -- 2 Conceptions of Professions | |
505 | 8 | |a 2.1 The Trait Model -- 2.2 The Proprietorial-Control Model -- The Application of Abstract Knowledge and Professional Ownership -- Professional Ethics and Client Choice -- 3 The Individualising Work of the Sentencing Professions -- 3.1 Autonomous Individualisation in the Discourse of Professional Responsibility -- 3.2 The Autonomous Individualisation of the Subject of Sentencing -- 4 Conclusions -- References -- 5 The Humanising Work of the Sentencing Professions: Individualising and Normalising -- 1 Professional Boundaries -- 1.1 Inter-professional Competition and the Division of Sentencing Work | |
500 | |a 2 Performing Legitimacy: The Cultivation of Ideal Clientele | ||
504 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index. | ||
650 | 0 | |a Sentences (Criminal procedure) |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85120062 | |
650 | 7 | |a Sentences (Criminal procedure) |2 fast |0 (OCoLC)fst01112638 | |
655 | 4 | |a Electronic books. | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |a Tata, Cyrus. |t Sentencing: a Social Process. |d Cham : Palgrave Macmillan UK, ©2020 |z 9783030010591 |
830 | 0 | |a Palgrave Macmillan socio-legal studies. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2012089163 | |
903 | |a HeVa | ||
929 | |a oclccm | ||
999 | f | f | |i 6408751e-759c-5598-9d94-3de6efd0b613 |s 5c07bb61-60b8-53f1-897f-f753e9294760 |
928 | |t Library of Congress classification |a XXK5121 |l Online |c UC-FullText |u https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-01060-7 |z Springer Nature |g ebooks |i 12566037 |