Kant's tribunal of reason : legal metaphor and normativity in the Critique of pure reason /
Saved in:
| Author / Creator: | Møller, Sofie, author. |
|---|---|
| Imprint: | Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY : Cambridge University Press, 2020. ©2020 |
| Description: | 1 online resource ( xii, 198 pages) |
| Language: | English |
| Subject: | |
| Format: | E-Resource Book |
| URL for this record: | http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/12521300 |
Table of Contents:
- Cover
- Half-title page
- Title page
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- List of Abbreviations
- Introduction
- The Cognitive Function of Metaphors
- Methodological Considerations
- The Primacy of Practical Reason and Epistemic Normativity
- Outline of the Book
- Chapter 1 The Critique of Pure Reason as the Establishment of Reason's Lawful Condition
- The Critique of Pure Reason as a Review of Laws
- The Natural Right Tradition and the Naturrecht Feyerabend
- The Critique of Pure Reason as a Lawful Solution to Conflicts
- Establishing a Rightful Condition
- Chapter 2 The Normativity of Law
- Natural Right and Positive Law
- Laws of Nature in the Natural Sciences
- A Priori Laws as Objectively Valid Rules
- Laws and Principles
- Understanding as Prescribing Laws to Nature
- Chapter 3 The Transcendental Deduction of the Categories and the Tradition of Legal Deductions
- Quid Juris and the Transcendental Deduction of the Categories
- The Analogy between Concepts and Property
- The Transcendental Deduction of the Categories as a Legal Deduction Tracing an Origin
- The Tradition of Legal Deductions
- Chapter 4 The Question of Fact and the Question of Law in Judicial Imputation and in the Transcendental Deduction of the Categories
- Quid Facti and the Tracing of an Origin
- Quid Facti and the Metaphysical Deduction of the Categories
- The Question of Fact and the Question of Law in Judicial Imputation
- The Transcendental Deduction of the Categories as Judicial Imputation
- Chapter 5 The Tribunal of Reason
- The Critique of Pure Reason as Tribunal
- Antinomy of Pure Reason as a Legal Trial
- Empirical Experience as Testimony
- The Reader as Judge of the Critique of Pure Reason
- The Outcome of the Critique of Pure Reason as Verdict
- Chapter 6 Moral Conscience as the Practical Inner Tribunal
- Conscience as an Inner Tribunal
- Self-deception in Moral Conscience
- The Problem of an Erring Conscience
- Parallels between Moral Conscience and the Critique of Pure Reason
- Chapter 7 Distinguishing between Rightful Claims and Groundless Pretensions
- Historical Background on Judicial Authority
- Kant on Judicial Authority
- The Judicial Office in the Legal Metaphors
- Authority and Validity of Judgements and Inferences
- Chapter 8 Epistemic Authority as both Individual and Collectively Shared
- Decrees as the Opposite of Verdicts
- Cognitive Attitudes
- Epistemic Authority and the Thinking Self
- Political Aspects of the Critique of Pure Reason
- The Community of Cognisers
- Chapter 9 Systematicity and Philosophy as the Legislation of Reason
- Other Images of Systematicity: The Organism and the Building
- Legal Metaphors as Illustrations of Systematicity
- Philosophy as the Legislation of Human Reason
- Systematicity in the Appendix to the Transcendental Dialectic
- The Critique of Pure Reason as a Science of the Laws of Pure Reason
- Conclusion.
