Regulating human research : IRBs from peer review to compliance bureaucracy /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Babb, Sarah L., author.
Imprint:Stanford, California : Stanford University Press, [2020]
Description:1 online resource (ix, 171 pages) : illustrations
Language:English
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/12542140
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:9781503611238
150361123X
9781503610149
1503611221
9781503611221
Notes:Includes bibliographical references and index.
Description based on online resource; title from digital title page (viewed on July 06, 2020).
Summary:This book traces the historic transformation of institutional review boards (IRBs) from academic committees to compliance bureaucracies. Sarah Babb opens the black box of contemporary IRB decision-making, which is increasingly outsourced to specialized private firms.
Other form:Print version: Babb, Sarah L. Regulating human research. Stanford, California : Stanford University Press, 2020 9781503610149
Review by Choice Review

As an institutional review board (IRB) professional, this reviewer was skeptical that anyone from the "outside" could capture the essence of IRB work. Babb (Boston College) overturns those fears with this outstanding volume. Having interviewed 50 individuals from the IRB world, she expertly describes IRB work from the early days of "approximate compliance," run largely by boards of volunteer academic faculty, to what has become a full-on compliance bureaucracy. She has captured the why and the how models of IRB review's evolution into an industry where the master's-trained IRB professional has become essential to helping organizations conform to complex and ambiguous regulatory rules. The author discusses both the upside and the downside of the professionalization and commercialization of the IRB complex and how the social sciences have been rolled into what had largely been a process with a biomedical focus. Comparing three different models of compliance bureaucracies, Babb's discussion of the differences between the ways equal employment opportunity, IRBs, and financial services approach compliance is compelling, particularly her consideration for the reliance of IRBs and financial services on efficiency goals. Thoughtful and readable. Summing Up: Highly recommended. All readership levels. --Kathleen E. Murphy, Northwestern University

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Choice Review