The Kurdish model of political community : a vision of national liberation defiant of the nation-state /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Baris, Hanifi, 1978- author.
Imprint:Lanham, Maryland : Lexington Books, [2021]
Description:1 online resource ( x, 219 pages)
Language:English
Series:Kurdish societies, politics, and international relations
Kurdish societies, politics, and international relations.
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/12566100
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:1793600015
9781793600011
9781793600004
Notes:Includes bibliographical references and index.
Description based on online resource; title from digital title page (viewed on February 22, 2021).
Other form:Print version: Baris, Hanifi, 1978- The Kurdish model of political community Lanham, Maryland : Lexington Books, 2020. 9781793600004
Review by Choice Review

This book argues that Kurds in Turkey and Syria should strive to achieve self-determination not via ethnonationalism or a national state, but rather by means of libertarian municipalism "wherein seizing state power through a revolution is replaced by building ecological and grass roots [sic] communes and autonomous towns and cities in Kurdistan, with or without authorization from centralized states" (e.g., Turkey and Syria). The author is a supporter of Abdullah Öcalan, the imprisoned leader of the Kurdish Workers' Party (PKK) in Turkey and the post-Marxist theoretician Murray Bookchin, both of whom posited impediments due to the "detachment" of Kurds from state-building projects and self-rule. Both have opposed a "single state" entity and a one-state constitution. The Kurdish movement itself is also opposed to the nation-state and to the universalism of the "Islamic Ummah," both of which, they argue, are antithetical to Kurdish self-rule allowing Kurds to have control over the means of violence and natural resources. The "Kurdish model" they advocate should increase understanding of citizenship, cultural/territorial boundaries, and autonomous/self-rule. The author acknowledges, however, that forces deployed by other political actors--here one may think of Turkey, Iraq, Iran, or Syria--will decide the fate of the model they proffer. So yes, indeed, this book makes a very dense and difficult argument. Summing Up: Optional. General readers. --Robert W. Olson, emeritus, University of Kentucky

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Choice Review