Judicial review in Norway : a bicentennial debate /
Saved in:
| Author / Creator: | Kierulf, Anine, 1974- author. |
|---|---|
| Imprint: | Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY : Cambridge University Press, 2018. ©2018 |
| Description: | 1 online resource (xxiii, 298 pages) |
| Language: | English |
| Series: | Comparative constitutional law and policy Comparative constitutional law and policy. |
| Subject: | |
| Format: | E-Resource Book |
| URL for this record: | http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/12576510 |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a2200000 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 12576510 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr cnu---unuuu | ||
| 008 | 190107s2018 enk ob 001 0 eng d | ||
| 005 | 20230326164338.0 | ||
| 019 | |a 1055687207 |a 1167115854 |a 1171143933 |a 1171943332 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781108648646 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 1108648649 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 9781108617727 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 1108617727 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 110844542X | ||
| 020 | |a 9781108445429 | ||
| 020 | |z 9781108426688 | ||
| 020 | |z 1108426689 | ||
| 020 | |z 9781108445429 |q (paperback) | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1081041970 |z (OCoLC)1055687207 |z (OCoLC)1167115854 |z (OCoLC)1171143933 |z (OCoLC)1171943332 | ||
| 035 | 9 | |a (OCLCCM-CC)1081041970 | |
| 040 | |a N$T |b eng |e rda |e pn |c N$T |d EBLCP |d YDX |d NOC |d CAMBR |d UAB |d OCLCF |d OTZ |d U3W |d OCLCQ |d LUN |d MM9 |d SXB |d OCLCQ |d K6U |d OCLCO | ||
| 043 | |a e-no--- | ||
| 049 | |a MAIN | ||
| 050 | 4 | |a KKN2650 |b .K54 2018eb | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 012000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 062000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a POL |x 040030 |2 bisacsh | |
| 090 | |a XXKKN2650 |b .K54 2018eb | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Kierulf, Anine, |d 1974- |e author. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/nb2005010003 | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Judicial review in Norway : |b a bicentennial debate / |c Anine Kierulf, Norwegian National Human Rights Institution. |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge, United Kingdom ; |a New York, NY : |b Cambridge University Press, |c 2018. | |
| 264 | 4 | |c ©2018 | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (xxiii, 298 pages) | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 347 | |a data file | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Comparative constitutional law and policy | |
| 520 | |a "Judicial Review in Norway Outside the United States, Norway's 1814 constitution is the oldest still in force. Constitutional judicial review has been a part of Norwegian court decision-making for most of these 200 years. Since the 1990s, Norway has also exercised review under the European Convention of Human Rights. Judicial review of legislation can be controversial: having unelected judges overruling popularly elected majorities seems undemocratic. Yet Norway remains one of the most democratic countries in the world. How does Norway manage the balance between democracy and judicial oversight? Author Anine Kierulf tells the story of Norwegian constitutionalism from 1814 until today through the lens of judicial review debates and cases. This study adds important insights into the social and political justifications for an active judicial review component in a constitutional democracy. Anine Kierulf argues that the Norwegian model of judicial review provides a useful perspective on the dichotomy of American and European constitutionalism"-- |c Provided by publisher | ||
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 274-289) and index. | ||
| 588 | 0 | |a Print version record. | |
| 505 | 0 | |a Cover; Half-title page; Series page; Title page; Copyright page; Dedication; Contents; List of Abbreviations; Table of Cases; 1 Introduction; 1.1 Background and Context; 1.2 Norway in a Nutshell; 1.3 Review under the Constitution and under the ECHR; 1.3.1 Debates on Review; 1.3.2 The Constitutional Debates; 1.3.3 The Constitutional Debates Internationalized; 1.4 Book Structure and Terminology; 2 Legal Foundations and Doctrinal Specifics; 2.1 Introduction; 2.2 The Norwegian Supreme Court; 2.3 The Form of and Basis for Constitutional Review; 2.3.1 Constitutional Judicial Review | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 2.3.2 Some Legal, Cultural and Methodological Features2.4 The Basis for ECHR Review; 2.4.1 Foundation and Scope of ECHR and ECtHR Review; 2.4.2 Outline of ECHR Review in Norway; 3 Foundations Reviewed: The Formative 1800s; 3.1 Outline of a Nation Constituted; 3.2 Courts, Lawyers and Background for Judicial Review; 3.3 On Not Losing Sight of (Some) Individuals; 3.4 Review Discussions Prior to the 1866 Case; 3.5 The 1866 Case; 3.6 Arguments following 1866; 3.7 Liberal Constitutionalism Defined; 4 The Emerging Regulatory State and a Constitutional Watershed (Early 1900s) | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 4.1 Constitutional Questions Arising -- and Discussed4.2 The Waterfall Case; 4.3 Legal Opinions of 1912 and 1916; 4.4 Legal Opinions Following the 1918 Case; 4.5 Parliamentary Debates on Review Abolishment; 4.6 Constitutional Case Adjourned; 5 Post-World War II: Social Democratic Constitutionalism?; 5.1 Introduction: Review Revival; 5.2 Occupation and Postwar Adjudication; 5.3 Regulatory Reconstruction; 5.4 Law, Politics and History; 5.5 Conquer and Divide: Preparing the Expropriation Statute; 5.6 The Kløfta Case; 5.7 Kløfta Case Follow-Up; 5.8 Judicial Review Confirmed | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 6 Debates of ECHR Review (1950-2000)6.1 Introduction; 6.2 "Original Intent"; 6.2.1 Ratification of the ECHR; 6.2.2 Recognition of the Commission and the ECtHR; 6.3 On ECHR Review Prior to the HRA: The Doctrine of Clarity; 6.4 Preparations for the Human Rights Act of 1999; 6.4.1 The Work Toward NOU 1993:18; 6.4.2 1993-1999; 6.4.3 Discussions in Parliament; 6.5 The Power and Democracy Project; 6.5.1 Democratic Legitimacy: Two Perspectives; 6.5.2 Democracy as Perceived by the Democratically Elected; 6.6 Postnational Constitutionalism?; 7 Dual Review Expressed (2000-2010) | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 7.1 Basis and Case Selection7.2 Speech Versus Personality Rights: Reputation; 7.2.1 Background; 7.2.2 Summary of Decisions; 7.2.3 Current Legal Situation; 7.2.4 Background: Defamation Law Development and the Role of Courts; 7.2.5 Perspectives; 7.3 Speech versus Policy: Political Advertising; 7.3.1 Background; 7.3.2 Summary of Decisions; 7.3.3 Current Legal Situation; 7.3.4 Perspectives; 7.4 Free Speech Review: A Synthesis of Ideals?; 8 A Triple Constitutional Review Revival: 2010; 8.1 Prelude; 8.2 2010 Cases; 8.2.1 Rt. 2010 s. 143: Shipping Tax | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Judicial review |z Norway. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Constitutional law |z Norway. | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Civil Procedure. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Legal Services. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a POLITICAL SCIENCE |x Government |x Judicial Branch. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Constitutional law. |2 fast |0 (OCoLC)fst00875797 | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Judicial review. |2 fast |0 (OCoLC)fst00984727 | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Norway. |2 fast |0 (OCoLC)fst01204556 | |
| 655 | 0 | |a Electronic books. | |
| 655 | 4 | |a Electronic books. | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |a Kierulf, Anine, 1974- |t Judicial review in Norway. |d Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY : Cambridge University Press, 2018 |z 9781108426688 |w (DLC) 2017055358 |w (OCoLC)1013518809 |
| 830 | 0 | |a Comparative constitutional law and policy. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2012051495 | |
| 903 | |a HeVa | ||
| 929 | |a oclccm | ||
| 999 | f | f | |s 3c3e3960-2f17-50ff-8ab0-eb128171210f |i 42592505-259f-5c1c-801d-d6e3bc40901f |
| 928 | |t Library of Congress classification |a XXKKN2650.K54 2018eb |l Online |c UC-FullText |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108617727 |z Cambridge University Press |g ebooks |i 12567856 | ||