Discussing cognitive neuroscience : psychology, neurophysiology, and philosophy on the mind, body and brain /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Benetka, Gerhard, author.
Imprint:Cham : Springer, [2021]
©2021
Description:1 online resource : illustrations.
Language:English
Series:Annals of theoretical psychology ; volume 17
Annals of theoretical psychology (Springer (Firm)) ; 17.
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/12600387
Hidden Bibliographic Details
Other authors / contributors:Werbik, Hans, 1941- author.
ISBN:9783030710408
3030710408
9783030710392
3030710394
Notes:Includes bibliographical references and index.
Online resource; title from PDF title page (SpringerLink, viewed May 28, 2021).
Summary:The sciences philosophy, psychology and neuroscience share the basis that all refer to the human being. Therefore, an interdisciplinary collaboration would be desirable. The exchange of criticism is an essential requirement for interdisciplinary collaboration. Criticism must be heard and if possible considered. Indeed, criticism can be valid or unwarranted. However, whether criticism is unwarranted can only emerge from discussion and conversation. In the discussion of cognitive neuroscience, some criticism can easily be considered (such as the mereological fallacy that represents that talking about the person is substituted with talking bout the brain). Another issue for an interdisciplinary discussion of cognitive neuroscience is the interpretation of the readiness potential including re-considering Benjamin Libet's classic experiments. Additionally, a critical discussion on cognitive neuroscience must address ethical questions, such as the possibility of the abuse of neuroscientific insight.
Other form:Print version: 3030710394 9783030710392
Standard no.:10.1007/978-3-030-71040-8

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000Ii 4500
001 12600387
005 20210812213020.0
006 m o d
007 cr |n|||||||||
008 210526s2021 sz a ob 001 0 eng d
020 |a 9783030710408  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 3030710408  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |z 9783030710392 
020 |z 3030710394 
024 7 |a 10.1007/978-3-030-71040-8  |2 doi 
035 |a (OCoLC)1252763792 
035 9 |a (OCLCCM-CC)1252763792 
040 |a YDX  |b eng  |e rda  |c YDX  |d GW5XE  |d OCLCO  |d EBLCP  |d N$T  |d OCLCF 
049 |a MAIN 
050 4 |a QP360.5  |b .B46 2021 
072 7 |a JMR  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a PSY008000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a JMR  |2 thema 
100 1 |a Benetka, Gerhard,  |e author.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/nr93015270  |1 http://viaf.org/viaf/71560575 
245 1 0 |a Discussing cognitive neuroscience :  |b psychology, neurophysiology, and philosophy on the mind, body and brain /  |c Gerhard Benetka, Hans Werbik. 
264 1 |a Cham :  |b Springer,  |c [2021] 
264 4 |c ©2021 
300 |a 1 online resource :  |b illustrations. 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent  |0 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/contentTypes/txt 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia  |0 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/mediaTypes/c 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier  |0 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/carriers/cr 
490 1 |a Annals of theoretical psychology ;  |v volume 17 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references and index. 
520 |a The sciences philosophy, psychology and neuroscience share the basis that all refer to the human being. Therefore, an interdisciplinary collaboration would be desirable. The exchange of criticism is an essential requirement for interdisciplinary collaboration. Criticism must be heard and if possible considered. Indeed, criticism can be valid or unwarranted. However, whether criticism is unwarranted can only emerge from discussion and conversation. In the discussion of cognitive neuroscience, some criticism can easily be considered (such as the mereological fallacy that represents that talking about the person is substituted with talking bout the brain). Another issue for an interdisciplinary discussion of cognitive neuroscience is the interpretation of the readiness potential including re-considering Benjamin Libet's classic experiments. Additionally, a critical discussion on cognitive neuroscience must address ethical questions, such as the possibility of the abuse of neuroscientific insight. 
505 0 |a Chapter 1. Critique of neuropsychology A polemic -- Chapter 2. Living body (Leib) or physical dataset? Antonio Damsio and Thomas Fuchs holistic conception of the human being as opposite standpoint to reductionist models -- Chapter 3. The person and the brain -- Chapter 4. The neuropsychological discourse in philosophical critique - Bennett/Hacker and the consequences -- Chapter 5. Persistent biologism and the misuse of neuropsychology an activity-theoretical contribution -- Chapter 6. Measuring free will with the readiness potential? New data on an old misunderstanding -- Chapter 7. The brain as protagonist Without the brain all is nothing -- Chapter 8. Is it possible to simulate thought 
588 0 |a Online resource; title from PDF title page (SpringerLink, viewed May 28, 2021). 
650 0 |a Cognitive neuroscience.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh91005166 
650 7 |a Cognitive neuroscience.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00866540 
655 4 |a Electronic books. 
700 1 |a Werbik, Hans,  |d 1941-  |e author.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n81084572  |1 http://viaf.org/viaf/7514220 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |z 3030710394  |z 9783030710392  |w (OCoLC)1237344527 
830 0 |a Annals of theoretical psychology (Springer (Firm)) ;  |v 17.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2015021404 
903 |a HeVa 
929 |a oclccm 
999 f f |i 426820ad-832f-5590-b7d8-090f5a0db166  |s d0e34fd0-8c55-5a10-a22d-b7df0c6b7f16 
928 |t Library of Congress classification  |a QP360.5 .B46 2021  |l Online  |c UC-FullText  |u https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-71040-8  |z Springer Nature  |g ebooks  |i 12615551