Raise the debt : how developing countries choose their creditors /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Bunte, Jonas B., author.
Imprint:New York, NY : Oxford University Press, [2019]
Description:1 online resource
Language:English
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/12615677
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:9780190909581
0190909587
9780190866181
0190866187
9780190866167
0190866160
Notes:Includes bibliographical references.
Online resource; title from digital title page (viewed on February 28, 2019).
Summary:Why do some governments borrow from China, while others borrow from the United States or the International Monetary Fund (IMF)? This book systematically explains how governments choose among competing loan offers. As the strings attached to loans vary across creditors, domestic interest groups prefer one type of creditor to the other. However, interest groups disagree about which creditor is preferable. Governments cater to whichever domestic interest group coalition is dominant by borrowing from the coalition's preferred creditor. The book offers evidence from Ecuador, Peru, and Colombia as w.
Other form:Print version: Bunte, Jonas B. Raise the debt. New York, NY : Oxford University Press, [2019] 9780190866167
Review by Choice Review

Developing countries borrow funds from a variety of sources. Bunte (UT Dallas) groups these sources into IFIs (international financial institutions, such as the International Monetary Fund and World Bank), DACs (Western governments who are members of the Development Assistance Committee), BRICs (Brazil, Russia, India and China), and private lenders. Each source has different conditions and different effects. To examine how a choice among creditors might be made, the author establishes three societal groups: finance, industry, and labor. Each group favors some creditors over others because of how they would be affected. These societal groups can have influence on government decision-making with regard to creditors. This influence can be stronger if two groups have similar interests. Thus the possibility of three coalitions; capital (finance and industry); corporatist (industry and labor); consumer (finance and labor). Using quantitative and qualitative methods, the outcomes suggested by the author are analyzed in depth in three countries: Ecuador, Colombia and Peru. These represent the three different coalitions while sharing similar characteristics of geography and democracy. The study was enlarged to 92 countries from 2005 to 2015 using data from many sources. The results support Bunte's thesis about how the coalitions influence developing countries' decisions. The book is derived from Bunte's dissertation. It is very repetitive. Summing Up: Recommended. Graduate students through faculty. --Janice E. Weaver, emerita, Drake University

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Choice Review