Towards consistency in international investment jurisprudence : a preliminary ruling system for ICSID arbitration /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Diel-Gligor, Katharina, author.
Imprint:Leiden ; Boston : Brill Nijhoff, 2017.
Description:1 online resource (538 pages)
Language:English
Series:Nijhoff international investment law series ; volume 7
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/12646581
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:9004337911
9789004337916
9004337903
9789004337909
9789004337909
Notes:Based on the author's thesis (doctoral - Universität Heidelberg. Juristische Fakultät, 2014).
Includes bibliographical references and index.
"Summary in German."
Electronic resource, viewed: July 15, 2021.
Summary:Investor-State arbitration is currently a much-debated topic, both within the legal community and in the public at large. In Towards Consistency in International Investment Jurisprudence , Katharina Diel-Gligor addresses the alleged proliferation of inconsistent decision-making in this field - one of the main points of concern raised in the ongoing discussions. After exploring whether such criticism is appropriate at all, she goes on to examine the different causes, forms, and manifestations of the inconsistencies that exist through a detailed analysis of ICSID arbitration. The author then canvasses possible approaches to reform and concludes that an ICSID preliminary ruling system - the practicalities of which are set out in the study - is a suitable means for enhancing consistency in investment arbitration and moving towards a jurisprudence constante .
Other form:Print version: Diel-Gligor, Katharina. Towards consistency in international investment jurisprudence. Leiden ; Boston : Brill Nijhoff, 2017 9789004337909
Standard no.:10.1163/9789004337916
Description
Summary:Investor-State arbitration is currently a much-debated topic, both within the legal community and in the public at large. In Towards Consistency in International Investment Jurisprudence , Katharina Diel-Gligor addresses the alleged proliferation of inconsistent decision-making in this field - one of the main points of concern raised in the ongoing discussions. After exploring whether such criticism is appropriate at all, she goes on to examine the different causes, forms, and manifestations of the inconsistencies that exist through a detailed analysis of ICSID arbitration. The author then canvasses possible approaches to reform and concludes that an ICSID preliminary ruling system - the practicalities of which are set out in the study - is a suitable means for enhancing consistency in investment arbitration and moving towards a jurisprudence constante .
Item Description:Based on the author's thesis (doctoral - Universität Heidelberg. Juristische Fakultät, 2014).
Physical Description:1 online resource (538 pages)
Bibliography:Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN:9004337911
9789004337916
9004337903
9789004337909