Trust and hedging in international relations /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Stiles, Kendall W., author.
Imprint:Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press, 2018.
Description:1 online resource
Language:English
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/12681391
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:9780472123575
0472123572
9780472130702
0472130706
Notes:Includes bibliographical references and index.
Print version record.
Summary:"Do States trust each other? What are the political and ethical implications of trust? Drawing from a wide range of disciplines, Trust and Hedging in International Relations adds to the emerging literature on trust in international relations by offering a systematic measure of state-to-state trust. Looking at how relationships between European microstates and their partners have evolved over the past few centuries, Stiles finds that rather than trusting, most microstates are careful to hedge in their relations by agreeing only to arrangements that provide them with opt-out clauses, heavy involvement in joint decision-making, and sunset provisions. In the process, Stiles assesses the role of rationality, social relations, identity politics, and other theories of trust to demonstrate that trust is neither essential for cooperation nor a guarantee of protection and safety. Finally, he explores the ethical implications of a foreign policy founded on trust--in particular whether heads of state have the right to enter into open-ended agreements that put their citizens at risk"--
Other form:Print version: Stiles, Kendall W. Trust and hedging in international relations. Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press, 2018 9780472130702
Standard no.:10.3998/mpub.9750852
Review by Choice Review

Stiles (Brigham Young) addresses the issue of trust and the role it plays in international relations. His work adds to the literature by developing an operational definition of trust using states' hedging strategies in order to assess the degree of trust between them. Stiles measures trust using eight dimensions grouped under three different topics: trustor-trustee relationship, issues in play, and structure of agreements. The author tests his definition of trust by first examining the European microstates of Luxembourg, Liechtenstein, San Marino, Monaco, and Andorra, states the author considers most likely cases of trust. The author finds that while the states do share interests, they do not trust each other based on broader definitions of trust; rather the relationships are based on thorough risk assessment, and arrangements between states are contingent on numerous factors. The author also includes brief case studies examining asymmetrical relationships of major powers including the US, Russia, and China, and finds that cultural, ethnic, and ideological similarities are key to trust-building among states, and that trust can be risky to the weaker state as well as to the great power. Summing Up: Recommended. Graduate students through professionals. --Michelle Lorene Keck, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Choice Review