The human gene editing debate /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Evans, John Hyde, 1965- author.
Imprint:New York, NY : Oxford University Press, 2021.
Description:1 online resource (216 pages) : illustrations (colour).
Language:English
Series:Oxford scholarship online
Oxford scholarship online.
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/12687862
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:9780197519592 (ebook) : No price
Notes:Previously issued in print: 2020.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Description based on online resource; title from home page (viewed on January 6, 2021).
Summary:For decades, the debate on human gene-editing has identified and agreed upon certain limits that draw the line between ethical and unethical territory: for example, applications for diseases are accepted, but not for enhancements. However, society keeps pushing the limits, as seen with the advent of CRISPR technology and the birth of the first genetically modified babies in China. John H. Evans rethinks how we discuss and debate these collective limits, which have long been characterized as a slippery slope. He examines past, present, and future arguments, and argues which limits can hold and which cannot, before we reach the dystopian bottom.
Target Audience:Specialized.
Other form:Print version : 9780197519561
Description
Summary:In 2018 the first genetically modified babies were reportedly born in China, made possible by the invention of CRISPR technology in 2012. This controversial advancement overturned the pre-existing moral consensus, which had held for over fifty years before: while gene editing an adult person was morally acceptable, modifying babies, and thus subsequent generations, crossed a significant moral line. If this line is passed over, scientists will be left without an agreed-upon ethical limit. What do we do now?<br> <br> John H. Evans here provides a meta-level guide to how these debates move forward and their significance to society. He explains how the bioethical debate has long been characterized as a slippery slope, with consensually ethical use at the top, nightmarish dystopia at the bottom, and specific agreed-upon limits in between, which draw the lines between the ethical and the unethical. Evans frames his analysis around these limits, or barriers. Historically they have existed to guide scientists and to prevent the debate from slipping down the metaphorical slope into unacceptable eugenicist possibilities, such as in Aldous Huxley's novel Brave New World or the movie Gattaca. Evans examines the history of how barriers were placed, then fell, then replaced by new ones, and discusses how these insights inform where the debate may head. He evaluates other proposed barriers relevant to where we are now, projects that most of the barriers suggested by scientists and bioethicists will not hold, and cautiously identifies a few that could serve as the moral boundary for the next generation. At a critical time in this new era of intervention in the human genome, The Human Gene Editing Debate provides a necessary, comprehensive analysis of the conversation's direction, past, present, and future.<br>
Item Description:Previously issued in print: 2020.
Physical Description:1 online resource (216 pages) : illustrations (colour).
Audience:Specialized.
Bibliography:Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN:9780197519592