Mortal objects : identity and persistence through life and death /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Luper, Steven, author.
Imprint:Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY : Cambridge University Press, 2022.
©2022
Description:vi, 205 pages ; 24 cm
Language:English
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Print Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/12716742
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:9781108833721
1108833721
9781108981316
9781108988346
Notes:Includes bibliographical references.
Summary:"Introduction. One day, there will be no creatures like us. We cannot prevent the eventual demise of humanity. But shouldn't we at least postpone it as long as possible - say by putting people in spaceships and populating planets across the galaxy, as the late Stephen Hawking and a slew of science fiction writers recommend? I once thought that the end of human existence would be an obvious and unequivocal tragedy (what could possibly be worse than human extinction?). However, my current view on the matter is more complicated. There are different roads that humanity might take, and different ways it may end, some far better than others. Some futurists write about making people smarter and stronger, even enabling them to live far longer. Some want us to turn ourselves into better versions of ourselves - to "become" the better versions. Some seem to envision improving people so substantially as to be no longer recognizably human, which might best be described as replacing ourselves with creatures that are superior to us. In that case, we are contemplating the demise of humanity again- brought about with an eye to improving (upon?) ourselves. However, if we populate the world with beings who are better than us, would it be tragic? Could we at least take pride in the fact that the better beings were our legacy? (Would we want to be replaced by a wholly alien species that is stronger, brighter, and better than us? Would we help hurry it along?) Would other legacies serve as well? Would leaving behind well-written books and impressive scientific research reconcile us to extinction?"--
Other form:Online version: Luper, Steven. Mortal objects Cambridge ; New York, NY : Cambridge University Press, 2022 9781108981316

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000 i 4500
001 12716742
008 211106t20222022enk b 001 0 eng
005 20220407165108.0
010 |a  2021044749 
035 9 |a (GOBI)40031027132 
040 |a LBSOR/DLC  |b eng  |e rda  |c DLC  |d OCLCF  |d OCLCO  |d UKMGB  |d YDX 
020 |a 9781108833721  |q hardcover 
020 |a 1108833721  |q hardcover 
020 |z 9781108981316  |q electronic book 
020 |z 9781108988346  |q electronic book 
035 |a (OCoLC)1267751855 
042 |a pcc 
050 0 0 |a BD336  |b .L87 2022 
082 0 0 |a 128/.4  |2 23/eng/20211202 
084 |a PHI004000  |2 bisacsh 
100 1 |a Luper, Steven,  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Mortal objects :  |b identity and persistence through life and death /  |c Steven Luper. 
264 1 |a Cambridge, United Kingdom ;  |a New York, NY :  |b Cambridge University Press,  |c 2022. 
264 4 |c ©2022 
300 |a vi, 205 pages ;  |c 24 cm 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a unmediated  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a volume  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references. 
505 0 |a Material objects -- Conformism -- Organisms -- Incregratism -- Selves -- The cogito -- Living and dying -- Welfare and nonexistence -- What we can become -- (Re)making ourselves -- The meaning of life and death. 
520 |a "Introduction. One day, there will be no creatures like us. We cannot prevent the eventual demise of humanity. But shouldn't we at least postpone it as long as possible - say by putting people in spaceships and populating planets across the galaxy, as the late Stephen Hawking and a slew of science fiction writers recommend? I once thought that the end of human existence would be an obvious and unequivocal tragedy (what could possibly be worse than human extinction?). However, my current view on the matter is more complicated. There are different roads that humanity might take, and different ways it may end, some far better than others. Some futurists write about making people smarter and stronger, even enabling them to live far longer. Some want us to turn ourselves into better versions of ourselves - to "become" the better versions. Some seem to envision improving people so substantially as to be no longer recognizably human, which might best be described as replacing ourselves with creatures that are superior to us. In that case, we are contemplating the demise of humanity again- brought about with an eye to improving (upon?) ourselves. However, if we populate the world with beings who are better than us, would it be tragic? Could we at least take pride in the fact that the better beings were our legacy? (Would we want to be replaced by a wholly alien species that is stronger, brighter, and better than us? Would we help hurry it along?) Would other legacies serve as well? Would leaving behind well-written books and impressive scientific research reconcile us to extinction?"--  |c Provided by publisher. 
650 0 |a Object (Philosophy) 
650 0 |a Ontology. 
650 0 |a Organisms. 
650 0 |a Life. 
650 0 |a Death. 
650 0 |a Posthumanism. 
650 7 |a PHILOSOPHY / Epistemology.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a Death.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00888613 
650 7 |a Life.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01198505 
650 7 |a Object (Philosophy)  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01042786 
650 7 |a Ontology.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01045995 
650 7 |a Organisms.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01047771 
650 7 |a Posthumanism.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst02027038 
776 0 8 |i Online version:  |a Luper, Steven.  |t Mortal objects  |d Cambridge ; New York, NY : Cambridge University Press, 2022  |z 9781108981316  |w (DLC) 2021044750 
929 |a cat 
999 f f |s 70752cae-2585-4625-8f2d-af6ebba478e4  |i 6c8ffc87-c274-4caa-bea3-f41f46934a98 
928 |t Library of Congress classification  |a BD336.L87 2022  |l JRL  |c JRL-Gen  |i 12852954 
927 |t Library of Congress classification  |a BD336.L87 2022  |l JRL  |c JRL-Gen  |b 117486713  |i 10377913